Turning the Screws on Bolton
Posted by Suzanne Nossel
Apropos of Heather's point about making the Bolton confirmation hearings a referendum on values, it appears that progressives on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee are raising some new issues. The NY Times reports:
[T]here have been accusations that Mr. Bolton has sought to remove dissenters from their posts or bar them from meetings called to discuss policies. A senior Central Intelligence Agency official has become the second government official to tell the Senate Intelligence Committee that he believes Mr. Bolton sought to remove him from his post after he complained that statements Mr. Bolton made in 2002 about a biological weapons program in Cuba did not reflect the views of intelligence agencies, Congressional officials said.
They said that the committee was reviewing those accusations, combined with previous allegations that Mr. Bolton had tried to suppress information undercutting the administration's contentions about unconventional weapons . . .
Some intelligence officials have complained that he used intelligence selectively, promoting views favorable to his positions on Cuba, Iraq, Syria and other countries.
If indeed Bolton made selective use of intelligence and tried to fire officials for voicing dissenting views, these actions are directly at-odds with President Bush's professed commitment to intelligence reform. Though we may agree on little else, the need for unbiased weighing of unvarnished intelligence should be a matter of unquestioned bi-partisan consensus after what successive reports have revealed about the catastrophic failures surrounding the Iraq invasion.
The public readily understands why willful manipulation of intelligence is dangerous. Depending on what is brought out in the hearings, they may now understand why Bolton is dangerous too.
I think the Bolton hearing will go just like the Rice hearings. The Democrats will unleash the untouchable attack dogs, like Boxer and Kennedy, for unseemly and unprofessional interviewing to keep up party morale. Levin and Feinstein will probably handle the legitimate questioning. And when it is all said and done, Bolton will be confirmed, which is the right thing to do.
It is extremely unlikely that he is not confirmed. I mean someone would have to find out he was a serial killer or something like that before his confirmation does not go through.
Posted by: VD | April 07, 2005 at 03:17 AM
So, Bolton was putting pressure on intelligence analysts to "doctor" their reports. This after the Senate 'investigation' into the intelligence failures during the buildup to the Second Gulf War (Iraq) declared that there was no political pressure placed on intelligence analysts to "doctor" their intelligence reports. Wow!
JMR
Posted by: John M Rutt | April 07, 2005 at 07:56 AM
I think the Democrats must have a death wish. Opposing Bolton's nomination confirms in the public mind the identification of the Democratic Party with the "Hate America First" crowd. This may please the members of the Hate America First crowd, of whom there are many in the Democratic Party, but could someone please tell me how this is going to help the party gain votes in the states it lost in November?
Posted by: DBL | April 07, 2005 at 01:29 PM
"Though we may agree on little else, the need for unbiased weighing of unvarnished intelligence should be a matter of unquestioned bi-partisan consensus after what successive reports have revealed about the catastrophic failures surrounding the Iraq invasion."
LOL! You really think the Bush administration shares this need? They're the ones manipulating the intelligence to suit their own needs, and with great success I might add, since they got the Iraq War they wanted so badly. With that kind of reward, and with their delusions of success in Iraq, I can't see how you can resonably argue that they haev any interest in reform, unless by reform you mean "destroying all dissenting voices from the government."
"The public readily understands why willful manipulation of intelligence is dangerous."
Really? Who is the public that you speak of? And what exactly do they understand about the willful manipulation of intelligence? Hell, a good percentage of the country probably still thinks that there was a connection between Al-Qaeda and Sadaam, so how do you figure they are even thinking about intelligence failures?
I really think you are fundementally misunderstanding the Bush Administration, particularly the NeoCons. They are revolutionaries, plain and simple, and they will (at least attempt to) destroy anything that stands in the way of their radical goals, including any intelligence agent that dares challenge their beliefs.
"I think the Democrats must have a death wish. Opposing Bolton's nomination confirms in the public mind the identification of the Democratic Party with the "Hate America First" crowd."
This has got to be the stupidest thing I've read all day. We oppose John "I have a scream" Bolton ( http://www.stopbolton.com/ ) and we "hate America"? I'll tell you what I hate- stupid angry instigators who get us into needless fights with our allies. I don't hate you though, DBL, I just feel sorry that your mind seems to have atrophied so badly.
Posted by: Alex Urevick-Ackelsberg | April 08, 2005 at 05:02 PM
runescape money runescape gold runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape gold runescape money runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold runescape accounts buy runescape accounts runescape lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro goldrunescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money Tabula Rasa Credit
Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold
Posted by: runescape money | November 25, 2007 at 12:17 AM
runescape money runescape gold runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape gold runescape money runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold runescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money lotro gold buy lotro gold Tabula Rasa Credit Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold dofus kamas buy dofus kamas 血管瘤 肝血管瘤 音乐剧 北京富码电视 富码电视 富码电视台 7天酒店 7天连锁酒店 7天连锁 自清洗过滤器 过滤器 压力开关 压力传感器 流量开关 流量计 液位计 液位开关 温湿度记录仪 风速仪 可燃气体检测仪 wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft PowerLeveling Warcraft Power Leveling World of Warcraft PowerLeveling World of Warcraft Power Leveling runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling
runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling 棕榈树
eve isk
eve online isk
eve isk
eve online isk
Posted by: runescape money | December 02, 2007 at 07:32 PM
I like to earn the World of Warcraft Gold very much, I want to have a lot of warcraft gold in the game, i do not satisfy the old equipment and so i have to buy wow gold to buy the new equipment to make me strong. If i am very strong in the game i can get some cheap wow gold as the rewards in the game. So i like the game very much.
Posted by: wow gold | December 24, 2008 at 11:17 PM
I hope i can get Atlantica Gold in low price.
Posted by: Atlantica online Gold | January 06, 2009 at 10:33 PM
If you have Atlantica online Gold, you can get more. If you gave Atlantica Gold to me, I still have my idea to achieve.
Posted by: Atlantica online Gold | January 20, 2009 at 01:40 AM
I hope i can get aoc gold in low price,
Yesterday i bought conan gold for my friend.
Posted by: age of conan gold | February 14, 2009 at 01:52 AM