Defense Reductions Done Right
Posted by Jacob Stokes
This week has seen a good deal of commentary about looming defense budget reductions, enough that a round-up of salient points is warranted. Any defense spending reductions discussion needs to start with strategy. Joe Nye’s piece in the Times today gets at that point. He proposes a move away from the oft-cited “lands wars in Asia”:
We also need to rethink how we use our military power... Opponents of defense cuts are raising the specter of isolationism and the weakening of American power. But there is a middle way…Counterinsurgency is attractive as a military tactic but it should not lead us into a strategy of nation-building in places where we do not have the capacity to engineer change. The maxim of avoiding major land wars in poor countries does not mean withdrawing our military presence from places like Japan and South Korea, or ending military assistance to countries like Pakistan and Egypt. Some analysts call this “off-shore balancing,” but that term must mean more than just naval and air force activity. For example, in Japan and South Korea, our allies pay a significant portion of the cost for basing American troops there because they want an insurance policy in a region faced with a rising China and a volatile North Korea.
The “roles and missions” review going on at Defense right now is set to address this, although I wouldn’t leave the burden of making tough choices on Defense to DoD—they have only a small interest in slimming their role.
Looking at strategy doesn’t mean we have to execute a radical change though. Even the largest cuts being discussed aren’t draconian by historical standards , writes Gordon Adams over on Battleland.
[Defense] can live with the roughly $400 billion in lower budgets than they planned over the decade. After all, that would be the savings from the current budget plan if Congress simply provided DOD with inflation growth every year over the next decade. But from where I sit, the Department can also live with $900 billion in budget discipline. It is, after all, only 14% of the currently projected defense budgets over the decade, a more moderate build down than the one Secretary Panetta helped execute (though Secretary Cheney and Chairman Powell began it) in the 1990s… In fact, from 1985 to 1998, defense spending (outlays) fell more than 35% in constant dollars. The force that remained, which was smaller, was also organized, coherent, and lethal. It was globally dominant and used Saddam Hussein as a speed bump in 2003. That was one of the best managed build-downs we have ever done; and it was the third one since 1950.
This is not to say the biggest budget reductions in wouldn’t demand hard choices; it’s just that those choices are possible to make without endangering American security. Reductions could even force a much-needed rebalancing of American power, writes Fareed Zakaria.
Defense budget cuts would also force a healthy rebalancing of American foreign policy. Since the Cold War, Congress has tended to fatten the Pentagon while starving foreign policy agencies. As former defense secretary Robert Gates pointed out, there are more members of military marching bands than make up the entire U.S. foreign service. Anyone who has ever watched American foreign policy on the ground has seen this imbalance play out. Top State Department officials seeking to negotiate vital matters arrive without aides and bedraggled after a 14-hour flight in coach. Their military counterparts whisk in on a fleet of planes, with dozens of aides and pots of money to dispense. The late Richard Holbrooke would laugh when media accounts described him as the “civilian counterpart” to Gen. David Petraeus, then head of U.S. Central Command. “He has many more planes than I have cellphones,” Holbrooke would say (and he had many cellphones).
That rebalancing is unlikely to happen, however. The dark underbelly of this deal is that 1) as Josh Rogin has written, nobody knows how big the defense cuts will really be, if they come at all. And 2) many of reductions will come from the larger “security” spending category that includes State, USAID, Energy, and Intel. In other words, if the Pentagon gets a haircut, expect the civilian agencies to get an even larger one, in percentage terms if not in dollars.
Understanding this budgetary formulation and where that road is likely to lead, John Kerry made a passionate defense of civilian international affairs spending earlier this week, explaining foreign aid as a cost-effective use of American power and leadership to help prevent more costly conflicts down the road.
Is there a cost to taxpayers? Of course. But all of our foreign aid programs and foreign policy initiatives— from sending diplomats to Afghanistan to helping reverse the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Africa—barely make up 1 percent of the annual budget. It is a relatively small investment for such a great return. This year alone we will spend approximately $700 billion on our military. The entire international affairs budget is less than one-tenth of that. As former Secretary Gates once pointed out, if you took the entire Foreign Service roster, you could barely staff one aircraft carrier…We can either pay now to help brave people build a better, democratic future for themselves or we will certainly pay later with increased threats to our own national security.
Doesn’t look good for the civilian side though. Up against defense’s constituency, State and AID look, well, a little under-gunned. That’s not to say the politics of budget cuts will make DoD work better, as Rob Farley laid out in his WPR column this week. He predicts that, “In the short run, cuts are going to lead to bloody fights that will leave behind a diminished military and a nasty bureaucratic mess.”
Standing in between cuts and that nasty bureaucratic mess will be Panetta and Pentagon weapons buyer Ash Carter, who will take Bill Lynn’s place as Deputy Secretary of Defense. Battleland’s Mark Benjamin called Carter a “budget cutter.” He sent a pretty strong signal earlier this year when Boeing announced cost overruns on the Air Force tanker. Carter’s response, as the WSJ put it: That’s Boeing’s problem, not the taxpayer’s.That’s an encouraging sign. In a time of less fat, the Pentagon needs to learn how to get more bang for the buck. All the money in the world won’t impose discipline on weapons design and procurement—and without discipline things can go wildly astray. (See David Axe’s detailed look at the Navy’s Littoral Combat Ship program for a blow-by-blow account of what a lack of clarity can do.)
Here’s how Carter plans to trim, according to Battleland:
Carter has outlined clearly in the past how he would like to shave the billions:
- He wants government contracting officials to reconsider contracts and try to figure out how much supplies "should" cost, rather than basing cost estimates on historical data.
- Particularly thrifty contractors who can prove they save money will get the contracts, though a "preferred" supplier program.
- Everybody knows about sole-source contracts and limited competition on contracts. Look for the sweetheart deals to decrease.
- Services, rather than bullets and tanks and things, makes up about $200 billion in Pentagon spending every year. Carter thinks there is a ton of fat here. Pay attention, service providers. One particular focus will be eliminating contracts for reports. The building is full of studies and reports that cost a lot and don't do much for anybody.
Lots of moving parts here. We’ll keep on it in the days and months ahead.
Perhaps we could decrease the 60,000 strong assassination squads a bit?
Posted by: Dredd | August 05, 2011 at 07:14 PM
Careful when buying these shoes. They may look like they are built for winter weather, but most are only built for cold, NOT FOR WET. Whether it's snow, or slush, or rain - your feet will get wet and cold with most of their styles. Not exactly what you are looking for in winter foot ware.
Posted by: wholesale silver jewelry | August 05, 2011 at 10:12 PM
I like it ,so i will still attention!
Posted by: lace wigs | August 06, 2011 at 02:00 AM
They may look like they are built for winter weather, but most are only built for cold, NOT FOR WET.
Posted by: Oakley Sunglasses | August 06, 2011 at 02:50 AM
The police of the world is not so easy.The country should solve its own problem first. so you should wear your own cheap oakley sunglasses or cheap oakleys.Defense reductions done right or not is also said too earlier.
Posted by: cheap oakleys | August 06, 2011 at 03:28 AM
antalya ev ilaçlama
Posted by: antalya böcek ilaçlama | August 07, 2011 at 12:56 PM
It's funny how we adopt words and adapt our lexicon to the times. This is a very useful slant on things.
Moncler T M
Posted by: Moncler T M | August 07, 2011 at 10:27 PM
Very comfortable and funky. I love wearing it with matching blouses or accessories, I got the raspberry colored ones which look very cute. They are very comfortable and good shoes for everyday.
Posted by: cheap ring | August 07, 2011 at 10:55 PM
The “roles and missions” review going on at Defense right now is set to address this
http://www.adidasf50adizeros.com
Posted by: Adidas F50 | August 07, 2011 at 11:55 PM
I admire you for your articles provide useful information. I will favorite your blog, have my children tested here, usually. I am sure they will lea n many new things here than anyone else!
Posted by: avery jerseys | August 08, 2011 at 01:05 AM
I will favorite your blog, have my children tested here, usually. I am sure they will lea n many new things here than anyone else!
Posted by: Cheap Oakleys | August 08, 2011 at 03:52 AM
The first time I came to like your blog, let me in it can learn about the latest thing, I will stay focused on.
Posted by: Outdoor LED lights | August 08, 2011 at 04:56 AM
This Way May Employed To Recognize PUMA ClothesThe building is full of studies and reports that cost a lot and don't do much for anybody.
Posted by: AlinaBonnie | August 08, 2011 at 05:10 AM
The first time I came to like your blog, let me in it can learn about the latest thing, I will stay focused on.
Posted by: Discount NFL Jerseys | August 08, 2011 at 05:38 AM
I love to read this type of stuff. Good and attractive information I take from it..Thank you for posting such a nice article.
Posted by: Cheap NFL Jerseys | August 08, 2011 at 05:39 AM
Good work! I like this post.
Posted by: Cheap NFL Jerseys | August 08, 2011 at 05:40 AM
I totally agree with this article.
Posted by: custom essay | August 08, 2011 at 05:58 AM
There's only one of us and we need to be good to ourselves
Posted by: aaa replica bags | August 08, 2011 at 01:22 PM
I was resistent to buy them since they seem so trendy and over exposed, but then my sister got a pair and insisted I try them. They were so warm and comfortable - just what I've needed to get me through a winter in New York City.
Posted by: Wholesale Necklace | August 08, 2011 at 11:34 PM
everybody have the same rights
Posted by: AR111 | August 09, 2011 at 02:04 AM
god will bless everyone
Posted by: AR111 | August 09, 2011 at 02:06 AM
Hi nice theme.Very clean.Do you know where I can get it?I gotta update my theme sometime.I look forward to more of your cool blog posts.
Posted by: best home workout dvd | August 09, 2011 at 02:44 AM
tried to think so, but i found it was not as the same in the actual process. As you mentioned, I still have doubts, but really thank you for sharing!
Posted by: Buy Insanity Workout DVD | August 09, 2011 at 04:01 AM
I took the time to read all the comments, but I really liked the article. It proved to be very helpful to me, and I believe all the critics here! Always good when you can not just be told, but!
Posted by: bobby cox replica jersey | August 09, 2011 at 05:31 AM
This year alone we will spend approximately $700 billion on our military. The entire international affairs budget is less than one-tenth of that. As former Secretary Gates once pointed out, if you took the entire Foreign Service roster, you could barely staff
Posted by: cheap nfl jerseys | August 09, 2011 at 05:45 AM
العاب سيارات
هيفاء وهبي
العاب اطفال
العاب مغامرات
لعبة البلياردو
ستار اكاديمي 8
العاب سبونج بوب
سبونج بوب
يوتيوب
نت لوق
Posted by: العاب سيارات | August 09, 2011 at 07:12 AM
Wonderful reading I have subscribed to your feed.
Posted by: justin morneau jersey youth | August 10, 2011 at 02:22 AM
every step surely should be made and this is one of them.
Posted by: smart pens | August 10, 2011 at 04:31 AM
I hope America could pass all of these trials. And be as strong as ever. God bless America.
Posted by: melbourne internet marketing | August 10, 2011 at 04:32 AM
That rebalancing is unlikely to happen, however. The dark underbelly of this deal is that 1) as Josh Rogin has written, nobody knows how big the defense cuts will really be
Posted by: moncler jackets | August 10, 2011 at 05:05 AM
Nice content..Really impressed!Everything is very, very clear, open is a description of the problem.
Posted by: Pepe Fanjul | August 10, 2011 at 08:33 AM
The most comfy shoes ever! I love these shoes. They are comfortable, in style and look good with everything, what more could you ask for in a shoe?
Posted by: china jewelry | August 10, 2011 at 09:51 AM
This is a great post--incredibly thorough. Ash Carter sounds like a promising player, especially given that he cut some costs without tangling with the "tough on defense" crowd in Congress. Take the contractors on directly, Alabama be damned! I've bookmarked the blog. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: Alex Jones | August 10, 2011 at 03:08 PM
agree with the above post.
Posted by: nfl jerseys | August 11, 2011 at 05:28 AM
Thank you for posting this great blog. The subject is intriguing to me.I hope you post more about it soon. It gave me good deeper insight.
Posted by: Amy McCraken | August 12, 2011 at 07:35 AM
I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is Timberland Boots written by him as no one else know such detailed about my difficulty. You’re wonderful! Thanks!
Posted by: Timberland Boots | August 13, 2011 at 04:00 AM
It wants, in the arresting words of a commentary in the People’s Daily – of all places – economic growth that is not “smeared in blood
Posted by: Black wigs | August 14, 2011 at 05:24 AM
We also need to rethink how we use our military power... Opponents of defense cuts are raising the specter of isolationism and the weakening of American power
Posted by: wigs for black women | August 14, 2011 at 05:25 AM
Very informative article. You have both insight as well as courage to say the right thing in a proper manner
Posted by: business loans | August 15, 2011 at 08:10 AM
Looks great feeling.
Posted by: beats dre studio | August 16, 2011 at 12:20 AM
A number of us learn all of the compelling way you produce rewarding information through this blog and as well strongly encourage contribution from others on the area so my girl is in fact being taught a lot of things.
Posted by: forum watches | August 16, 2011 at 01:04 AM
Great article.
Posted by: dr dre solo | August 16, 2011 at 03:32 AM
This is a great one..nice article, thanks for share with us… I learn a lot with your words.. thank for the post.
Posted by: 下着 | August 17, 2011 at 04:27 AM
For the imaginary benefit Canada Goose Jackets of buying directly, and without Canada Goose Outlet duties, from a foreign Canada Goose Coats nation which takes their cotton, they would Canada Goose Parka give up and sacrifice the entire Canada Goose Jacket manufacturing industry of their own country, and return to a state of colonial dependency on Great Britain
Posted by: laueveransweres | August 17, 2011 at 05:19 AM
Nice post.It's all in the eyes and where they are looking~
Posted by: thomas sabo uk | August 18, 2011 at 04:24 AM
Nice post! I have read it carefully and I'm like it very much. Thank you for your post it out for us!
Posted by: 2011 watches | August 19, 2011 at 03:56 AM
Thank you for the great time on your blog.
Posted by: nikedunkheels | August 20, 2011 at 04:59 AM
I still have a problem with your hypothetical leap, one might do well to fill in all these breaks. If you really can achieve this goal, I will certainly be surprised.
Posted by: zach thomas jersey number | August 24, 2011 at 03:25 AM
I'm glad I stumbled across your site today and found this short articleis very enlightening. I sent it to my own best friend is also interested in the subject lot.
Posted by: jinlala | August 24, 2011 at 04:20 AM
I have a look at your article and learn from some useful information,thanks so much!
Posted by: Tag Heuer watch sale | August 24, 2011 at 04:59 AM
Many thanks for the article. I will have a link back to this information from our fresh blog.
http://www.cheapcanadagooses.com
http://www.cheapcanadagooses.com
http://www.cheapcanadagooses.com
Posted by: Canada Goose Jackets | August 26, 2011 at 05:49 AM
What kind of thing are girls go out shopping is the most important thing, no doubt, is certainly handbag
Posted by: discount coach handbags | August 28, 2011 at 10:05 PM
An earthquake measuring 6.1 on the Richter scale jolted off the south Pacific islands of Vanuatu on Monday morning (21:44:21 GMT on Sunday), the U.S. Geological Survey said.The epicenter, with a depth of 59.40 km, was initially determined to be at 19.1556 degrees south latitude and 168.6960 degrees east longitude.A powerful earthquake measuring 7.0 on the Richter scale struck off the island nation of Vanuatu on Sunday morning (2255 GMT Saturday).
Posted by: rolex watches | September 05, 2011 at 02:37 AM
Many thanks for the article. I will have a link back to this information from our fresh blog.
Posted by: women jordan heels | September 07, 2011 at 12:56 AM
We have gotten many great comments from our customers and earn a good reputation in foreign makerts, more than 90% customers are satisfied with our products and service, till now our online members are beyond 80,000. As of right now, we Replica Handbags currently serve customers from over 18 countries, and we are still growing. We really hope to expand our business through cooperation with individuals and companies from around the world.
Posted by: chaussures femmes | September 08, 2011 at 02:59 AM
your opinion is right! I support you! I will let my friends to read!
Posted by: luxury handbags | September 12, 2011 at 01:24 PM
i like it, thank you for sharing.
Posted by: ac adapter | September 14, 2011 at 11:32 PM
This is a great one..nice article, thanks for share with us…
Posted by: acekard 2i | September 20, 2011 at 12:59 AM
I like it ,so i will still attention!
Posted by: nikemercurialvapor-shoes | September 21, 2011 at 01:48 AM
I was actually looking for this resource a few weeks back. Thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.This will absolutely going to help me in my projects.
Posted by: best replica watches | September 21, 2011 at 03:44 AM
with us your wisdom.This will absolutely going to
Posted by: akku Akoya E1210 | September 22, 2011 at 03:54 AM
to show the etched Rolex crown just below the 6. It’s tiny, but very clear, and generally not done well by fakers. Genuine case backs will also have a hologram sticker. The fakes might try to duplicate this, but move the watch around in the light and you’ll see it’s not a real hologram.
Posted by: rolex daytona | October 12, 2011 at 04:36 AM
your opinion is right! I support you! I will let my friends to read!
Posted by: louis vuitton handbags on sale | October 18, 2011 at 02:34 PM
Not one other hobby has already established as much exposure as smoking has. For tribes, smoking cigarettes was an indication of good belief in addition to a method to contact the dead.
Posted by: CL outlet | October 23, 2011 at 11:51 PM
You have done some good points there. I did a search on the subject, found a considerable number of people will follow your blog.
Posted by: knockoff handbags | October 26, 2011 at 03:58 AM
A real lot of useful info here!These are all great comments here. Very cool article.
Posted by: moncler down jackets | November 28, 2011 at 08:59 PM