The Mystery of Bob Gates, aka "America's Best Defense Secretary"
Posted by Michael Cohen
Justin Logan and Ben Friedman have a must read in Foreign Policy about the myth of Bob Gates as America's best defense secretary. It's worth reading the entire piece, but this section really jumped out at me:
The secretary has an uncanny knack for saying things that get him credit for what he will not do, as defense analyst Lawrence Korb has noted. Gates claimed it's crazy to send ground forces in large numbers to Asia or the Middle East after advocating precisely that in Afghanistan. He said that diplomacy is underfunded compared with defense, but wouldn't surrender funds for the State Department . . . He just gave a speech at the American Enterprise Institute saying that saving money on defense requires re-examining roles and missions -- two days after giving another speech at the University of Notre Dame claiming that all of the Defense Department's roles and missions are essential.
This has always been my great confusion about Bob Gates. He brags about defense cuts at the same that defense budgets have continued to expand under his watch. He has done precious little to reform the contracting process that squanders so much in the way of taxpayer dollars; his major cuts in defense programs have actually not amounted to much; his QDR simply reiterated the DC conventional wisdom that American leadership must be preeminent on the global stage and it must be guaranteed by a military that continues to take on more and more responsibilities - many of which should belong to civilian agencies.
I suppose in the constricted world of DC policy debates this is somehow what defines a maverick or an "out-of-the-box thinker" but in reality it's the profile of a guy who, on defense issues, has basically kicked the can down the road. I wrote about this a bit in 2009:
Secretary of Defense Gates caused a buzz in 2007 when he declared the need for a “dramatic increase in spending on the civilian instruments of national security.” But nowhere did he call for the Pentagon to shed any responsibilities. Indeed, in his next breath, Gates made clear “I’ll be asking for yet more money for Defense this year.” At the same time, he noted the incongruous sight of “field artillerymen and tankers building schools and mentoring city councils.” Gates remarked that these skills will need to be “institutionalized and retained” in the military.
As Logan and Friedman note the gap between what Gates receives credit for, and what he's actually done is bizarrely wide.
On Afghanistan this story is even worse; for a guy who seemingly has the knowledge to understand that it's a bad idea to send large numbers of ground forces into a Middle Eastern or Asian country . . . he presided over both the Iraq surge and was the biggest civilian proponent in the Obama Administration of expanding the US presence in Afghanistan.
And right now Gates is doubling down on a bad policy by running around Afghanistan telling every reporter in sight that it is not the right time to begin drawing down troops from the fight or even opening political negotiations with the Taliban. He's doing this at the exact moment that the President and his national security advisors are having a debate about whether and how many troops will actually be drawn down from Afghanistan in July. Seems like an odd thing for a Cabinet Secretary to be putting his thumb on the scale in public while the President is trying to make a vital national security decision.
Ask yourself DA reader, can you imagine any other Cabinet Secretary publicly advocating for a position on an issue being debated at that exact moment by the President of the United States? it's almost as if Gates thinks he's a four star general and thus immune from the traditional rules of public comment on presidential decision-making on matters of national security.
But hey he's the greatest defense secretary so perhaps I should just get with the program.
It is a long time since my last visit. At this moment, I just can't read this article patiently. My dear grandma died and I was so sorrowful these days. I was too sad to read this essay and I just leave a commment without reading this passage.
cheap new converse shoes
Posted by: Ringring | June 06, 2011 at 08:58 PM
Robert Gates was also wrong about the Cold War in the late eighties. Gates believed Gorbachev to be just an ordinary Soviet leader and that the Soviet Union would still exist in the twenty-first century. Robert Gates is respected by the MSM because he vouches for the military, and the press worhips those in uniform.
Posted by: John Henninger | June 06, 2011 at 10:09 PM
America 's war policy is not expected to greatly change with his departure, the future of military spending is not as clear. Gates was a strong opponent of deep cuts in military spending. Robert Gates may well be the best secretary of defense the United States has ever produced.
Posted by: London escorts | June 06, 2011 at 11:04 PM
I just can't read this article patiently. My dear grandma died and I was so sorrowful these days. I was too sad to read this essay and I just leave a commment without reading this passage.
Posted by: laptop battery | June 06, 2011 at 11:27 PM
This information is too good about the America's Best Defense Secretary.And its also the talk about the defense budgets.Great sharing it is.
Posted by: hydroponics | June 07, 2011 at 03:23 AM
meetings remain secret. It sends conflicting signals to the troops and is a strange way to run a war.
Posted by: Quinceanera Dresses | June 07, 2011 at 05:10 AM
Sorry I meant worships and not worhips in my previous comment.
Posted by: John Henninger | June 07, 2011 at 09:47 PM
This post was very nicely written, and it also contains many useful facts.
deberry.de
Posted by: Hochzeitskleider | June 07, 2011 at 11:03 PM
I have read the America's Best Defence Secretary 's Post, which you have to mentioned here. I feel Great about this and I benefit from learning about this Post.
Posted by: r4 | June 08, 2011 at 01:40 AM
The article is worth reading, I will share with my friends. discount herve leger it namely about an momentous entity. But it namely fact occured in our life, Tods 2011, fair trust it. It is a excellent newspaper for everyone. In September 1998, paul smith designer, herve leger dress were acquired by group from the Seagram’s Group. In April 2007, designer max azria relaunched the cheap herve leger dress under his own devise instruction. His fall 2009 collection traits several dark herve leger bandage with sequins, Paul Smith shop online, which creates a alter textured feel because the dresses. herve leger skirt was warmhearted greeted by people at the beginning. herve leger 2011 designs are a modern interpretation of the signature bandage herve leger dress and have yet earned a cloud of stylish somebody fans including kate bosworth and keira knightley. herve leger discount dress apt make your cice to go in the vogue front. herve leger dresses cheap the formation of a trbring an end to ... the distraction manufacture, Tods outlet, the trend of the wind out of the entertainment industry has affected the people who adore fashion. Find your own strapless herve leger? Heart not as good as action! Why not to take this contingency to purchase a discount herve leger dresses, tods bags!
Posted by: discount herve leger | June 08, 2011 at 03:09 AM