There's Nothing Easy About War - The Libya Version
Posted by Michael Cohen
There's a lot that Shadi has written below that I find disagreement with, but one paragraph really does jump out:
I don't know about you - but I have trouble understanding how people can be okay with sitting back and doing nothing, when, with military intervention, it [protecting civilians] could fairly easily be prevented. We can stop it. Moving to the strict "interests" rationale, it seems fairly self-evident that Libya, under an isolated Qaddafi, would likely return to attacking Western interests in the region, including through terrorism. He's done it before.
Putting aside the notion that an isolated Qaddafi would be more likely to return to terrorism than say a Qaddafi under military attack from the West . . . I would have thought by now that after that whole "greeted by liberators" and "cakewalk" thing in Iraq, foreign policy analysts would be a little more circumspect in describing the use of military force as "easy." This is precisely the sort of language and attitude that worries me so much about this operation - the propensity to watch pictures of cruise missiles flying off ships or see the wreckage from Allied airstrikes and come to believe that anything we are trying to do in Libya today is not extraordinarily difficult or that somehow the hardest part has been done.
I have enormous respect for Shadi's passion around this issue - and the passion of those supporting the use of force. And as I've said I think the decision to intervene is a close call. But it would be helpful if those advocating the use of force were a bit more skeptical about what it can hope to achieve - particularly in regard to protecting civilians. This sort of disregard for the inherent challenges in military intervention is both wrong, it's dangerous - and it seems endemic in the foreign policy community. And dare I say it's a good part of the reason we've stumbled our way into the third military intervention in the last ten years in the Muslim world. How many times will we underestimate the consequences of using military force before we become a bit more hesitant about its recommended utilization?
And to be very candid, no one seems more guilty of this than the President of the United States. Consider this quote from the NYT piece about the decision to intervene:
The president had a caveat, though. The American involvement in military action in Libya should be limited — no ground troops — and finite. “Days, not weeks,” a senior White House official recalled him saying.
Where does this sound familiar? Perhaps from the debates about Afghanistan when Obama demanded that escalation be short-lived and troop withdrawals commence in July 2011. Or perhaps when he told the military that no US troops should be sent to areas that couldn't be turned over to the ANSF by the same date. How are those dictates working out?
You would think that after a deadline for withdrawal from Afghanistan evolved from July 2011 to 2014 this President would be skeptical that any use of military force would be tidy, can be easily limited or could be completed in days, not weeks.
Apparently not.
“The president is the commander-in-chief, but the administration has a responsibility to define for the American people, the Congress, and our troops what the mission in Libya is, better explain what America’s role is in achieving that mission, and make clear how it will be accomplished,” the Ohio Republican said in a statement. “Before any further military commitments are made, the administration must do a better job of communicating to the American people and to Congress about our mission in Libya and how it will be achieved.”
Posted by: Atlanta Roofing | March 20, 2011 at 10:37 PM
Hope that war will be over soon!
Posted by: Discount Golf Clubs | March 21, 2011 at 03:45 AM
Thanks for sharing it with us.Informative!
Posted by: lace wigs for black women | March 21, 2011 at 04:15 AM
thanks
Posted by: Oil Mill | March 21, 2011 at 04:39 AM
Its very informative blog.Its al about the Terrorism and the Military Attacks.And one of the interesting Note you have provided here.Thank you for Sharing such a great things.
Posted by: Mechanix wear gloves | March 21, 2011 at 07:33 AM
The president had a caveat, though. The American involvement in military action in Libya should be limited — no ground troops — and finite.
Posted by: Merchant Cash Advance | March 21, 2011 at 04:07 PM
Very nice topic. the president is right. Photo.
Posted by: yemek tarifleri | March 21, 2011 at 06:20 PM
Discount pandora charms is pandora usually formed by the Danish expensive jewelry artists Each Enevoldsen for 1979. In a little while this type of business enterprise has been mopping worldwide. He was quoted saying, pandora charms Ive never thought this Pandora has got delicious effect these days. One reason tends to be that weâve been concerning about the new product pattern in addition to system superior quality, nevertheless the victory got here soundlessly. Via Early in the eightys, the happy pandora australia couple commonly imported out of Thailand pandora jewelry for full price as well as would a very long time inexpensive online business. After encountering several direction pandora.com.au means together with a solid develop sales, the happy couple decide to build their particular expensive jewelry plant around Thailand later. Inside 1989, they put in place a smaller manufacturing plant inside Bangkok and did start to prepare goods which designed by your pet designed for construct inside Thailand. During 2000, this wonderful pandora rings time Pandora bracelets that had been copyrighted plus created by the pup and sold in that Denmark market, which in turn shot to popularity speedily round the whole entire Pound.
Posted by: pandora jewelry | March 21, 2011 at 09:05 PM
They are interested in the post.
Posted by: christian louboutin designer | March 22, 2011 at 11:47 PM
me inexpensive online business. After encountering several direction pandora.com.au means together with a solid develop sales, the happy couple decide to build their particular expensive jewelry plant around Thailand later. Inside 1989, they put in place a smaller manufacturing plant inside Bangkok and did start to prepare goods which designed by your pet designed for construct inside Thailand. During 2000, this wonderful pandora rings time Pandora bracelets that had been copyrighted plus c
Posted by: 冷夜 | March 23, 2011 at 03:10 AM