Incentives and Isotopes
Posted by Kelsey Hartigan
Yesterday, NSN and the Center for America Progress co-hosted a forum on principled and pragmatic policy options for dealing with Iran. Paul Pillar’s write-up in the National Interest offers an overview of his remarks and a reminder of why the current debate over Iran’s enrichment program isn’t getting us too far.
“For all the focus on uranium enrichment, the western side has done little to explore with Iran the possibilities for imparting greater transparency to the Iranian program as a form of safeguards against diversion to military purposes. Our leaders and negotiators have uttered a few things about how someday the west might trust Iran with its own enrichment program, but we have given the Iranians almost no reason to believe any such utterance.
“From Tehran's viewpoint, the overriding message being received is one of pressure and more pressure, of unrelenting animosity, and of lack of acceptance. It is quite understandable for Tehran to conclude that even if it were to end its enrichment program, the state of relations would not fundamentally change and that the principal U.S. goal is, and will remain, regime change. Such a conclusion destroys any Iranian incentive to make concessions on the nuclear program or anything else under discussion. And it increases the Iranian motivation to develop nuclear weapons.
“The fruitless quest for a no-enrichment solution, which has been going on now for some time, lessens the chance of achieving more feasible but still favorable outcomes. And if the saber rattling were ever to lead to the use of military force, among the disastrous consequences for U.S. interests would be to ensure the enmity of future generations of Iranians and to provide the strongest possible incentive for those Iranians to build, or rebuild, a nuclear weapons capability.
Olli Heinonen, former deputy director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, recently floated an interesting proposal— one that could help alleviate the current stalemate on the enrichment question and begin to shift the dynamic Pillar describes above. Heinonen suggests that the U.S. and its partners, presumably the P-5 +1, work with Iran to build a new research reactor that is designed to use low enriched uranium.
Iran is currently constructing a heavy water reactor, the IR-40, but it's not expected to be operational until sometime around 2013 at the earliest. As ISIS explains, "If operating optimally, the IR-40 would produce about 9 kilograms of plutonium annually or enough for about two nuclear weapons each year." If the U.S. and others worked with Iran to modify the reactor design it could ease some of the proliferation concerns and possibly create space for a future fuel swap.
“The offer to help build a new, more secure research reactor to replace the TRR could revive the fuel swap program, in which Iran would agree to send more of its enriched uranium out of the country to be converted into fuel for the new reactor. The outcome would provide Iran with a solid supply of medical isotopes and a new, up-to-date training facility for its scientists. And it would address proliferation concerns by limiting the increase of stocks of enriched uranium and future production of plutonium…
“A modern, more powerful research reactor will require a substantial part of Iran's current stocks of enriched uranium -- ensuring that they are not available for further enrichment for weapons -- and provide a secure, reliable supply of radioisotopes for decades to come. It would only be a first step, however. Iran will still need to address the world's broader concerns about the scope and intentions behind its nuclear program. But successful cooperation on a new reactor might make those conversations a little bit easier.
This would in no way be a silver bullet for dealing with Iran’s nuclear program but such an incentive could help temper the level of distrust that currently exists and provide a stronger platform for future dialogue, perhaps even on matters beyond the nuclear issue.
Why does Iran's uranium enrichment program require cessation or even greater transparency when it is and has been under complete 24/7 surveillance by the IAEA as required by the NPT, and the IAEA has consistently reported that there has been no diversion of enriched uranium to weapons programs?
"Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes to accept safeguards, as set forth in an agreement to be negotiated and concluded with the International Atomic Energy Agency in accordance with the Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Agencys safeguards system, for the exclusive purpose of verification of the fulfillment of its obligations assumed under this Treaty with a view to preventing diversion of nuclear energy from peaceful uses to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices."
Regarding the concern about plutonium after 2013, has Iran been requested to place that reactor under IAEA surveillance as required by the NPT?
But none of this matters because the real issue with Iran is not nuclear it is Iran's refusal to kowtow to the US in the ME, and Iran's support for the Palestine resistance of Israel's increasing takeover of Palestine. The nuclear issue is an attention-getting red herring, an excuse to portray Iran as an enemy and sanction Iran. Under such conditions "principled and pragmatic policy options" are non-starters.
Posted by: Don Bacon | February 04, 2011 at 07:03 PM
The outcome would provide Iran with a solid supply of medical isotopes and a new, up-to-date training facility for its scientists. These all are great to know
Posted by: Pet Beds | February 07, 2011 at 12:51 AM
“By and large, I clearly had not found a way to help classes full of MBAs see that there is more to life than money, power, fame and self-interest.”
Posted by: Office 2010 | February 08, 2011 at 02:46 AM
In all these there are so many things which is great that can be help with so many things which is great and also one of the self interest these all things are great to know about it.
Posted by: Canadian Drugs Online | February 10, 2011 at 01:13 AM
The nuclear issue is an attention-getting red herring, an excuse to portray Iran as an enemy and sanction Iran. Under such conditions "principled and pragmatic policy options" are non-starters.
Posted by: Pet Supplies | February 11, 2011 at 01:10 AM
The nuclear issue is an attention-getting red herring, an excuse to portray Iran as an enemy and sanction Iran. Under such conditions "principled and pragmatic policy options" are non-starters.
Posted by: abendkleider | February 15, 2011 at 04:43 AM
These all are attention for getting the red herring it can be desire so many things which can be one of the great to know about it.
Posted by: Car Parts | February 16, 2011 at 12:31 AM
thanks admin ben bu sitede filmde izlerim hrsey var .
Posted by: film izle | February 18, 2011 at 09:44 AM
There is obviously a lot to know about this. I think you made some good points in Features also.
Posted by: Solid State Relay | March 02, 2011 at 09:32 PM
But none of this matters because the real issue with Iran is not nuclear it is Iran's refusal to kowtow to the US in the ME, and Iran's support for the Palestine resistance of Israel's increasing takeover of Palestine. The nuclear issue is an attention-getting red herring, an excuse to portray Iran as an enemy and sanction Iran. Under such conditions "principled and pragmatic policy options" are non-starters.
Posted by: 冷夜 | March 07, 2011 at 12:05 AM
In all these there are so many things which is great that can be help with so many things which is great and also one of the self interest these all things are great to know about it.
Posted by: bedava porno | March 10, 2011 at 12:00 PM
This is great! It really shows me where to expand my blog.
Posted by: NBA Basketball Jerseys | March 19, 2011 at 04:47 AM
There are a number of very nice points made here. Generally, I’m not really keen on information sites. then again, once in a while all of us should take notice. Inspiring, I am thankful to you.
Posted by: HIGH PANERAI REPLICA WATCHES | March 25, 2011 at 02:32 AM
it is good
watch5
whowatch
watchse
uwatch
Uwatch
iwatch
needwatch
watcheslife
livewatch
Posted by: goodwatches | March 31, 2011 at 10:28 PM
I have searched this information for a long time.
Posted by: Cosplay Wigs | April 06, 2011 at 11:02 PM
Wow, ah well ! Thanks for sharing such good information.I long exposure.
Posted by: Discount bags | April 10, 2011 at 12:53 PM
This is great! It really shows me where to expand my blog.
Posted by: HCG Diet | April 14, 2011 at 05:39 AM
i can study some info from your article,thanks.
Posted by: knockoff handbags | April 19, 2011 at 05:10 AM
Good essay
Posted by: The best knockoff handbags | April 23, 2011 at 03:58 AM
Total 200ml of the effects of individual constituents in selulex If we talk about;
Posted by: havyar jeli | April 25, 2011 at 05:59 PM
Thanks , I have just been looking for information about this topic for ages and yours is the best I’ve discovered till now.
Posted by: soccer cleats | April 26, 2011 at 01:57 AM
The carefully crafted image that you want to use this formula to do with the short term is now not far from reach.
Posted by: oakley sunglasses | May 04, 2011 at 05:18 AM
How many bags do you have ? now I have M40144,M41528,M40352,M40353,M40155,M40156,M40157,M41414,M41416 and my most lovelyM40249
Posted by: replica handbags | May 13, 2011 at 10:24 AM
That's all I can say. You most definitely have made this blog into something special.
Posted by: wholesale replica handbags | May 21, 2011 at 01:01 AM
Thank your for sharing your wonderful article. I very agree with your views from here.
Posted by: replica panerai | June 30, 2011 at 05:15 AM
thanks for sharing your article, i am like that.
Posted by: replica handbags | July 04, 2011 at 10:02 AM
ABCELLEN A young man, a student in one of our universities, was one day taking a walk with a professor, who was commonly called the students' friend, for his kindness to those who waited on his instructions. As they went along, they saw lying in the path a pair of old shoes, which they supposed to belong to a poor man who was employed in a field close by, and who had nearly finished his day's work.
The student turned to the professor, saying: "Let us play the man a trick: we will hide his shoes, and conceal ourselves behind those bushes, and wait
to see his perplexity when he cannot find them."
"My young friend," answered the professor, "we should never amuse ourselves at the expense
of the poor. But you are rich, and may give yourself a much greater pleasure by means of the poor man. Put a coin into each shoe, and then we will hide ourselves and watch how the discovery affects him."
Posted by: belstaff uk | August 05, 2011 at 11:28 PM
ABCELLEN A young man, a student in one of our universities, was one day taking a walk with a professor, who was commonly called the students' friend, for his kindness to those who waited on his instructions. As they went along, they saw lying in the path a pair of old shoes, which they supposed to belong to a poor man who was employed in a field close by, and who had nearly finished his day's work.
The student turned to the professor, saying: "Let us play the man a trick: we will hide his shoes, and conceal ourselves behind those bushes, and wait
to see his perplexity when he cannot find them."
"My young friend," answered the professor, "we should never amuse ourselves at the expense
of the poor. But you are rich, and may give yourself a much greater pleasure by means of the poor man. Put a coin into each shoe, and then we will hide ourselves and watch how the discovery affects him."
Posted by: belstaff uk | August 05, 2011 at 11:28 PM
Looks great feeling.
Posted by: beats dre studio | August 16, 2011 at 02:35 AM
Great article.
Posted by: dr dre solo | August 16, 2011 at 04:22 AM
Sorry,i don't know how to receive my response, why?
Christian Louboutin/Shoes/Sale/Cheap/Outlet/UK/Shop/Store/2011/Online/Discount/
http://www.christianlouboutins-cheap.com/
Posted by: Christian Louboutin | September 02, 2011 at 05:50 AM
Thanks for the insight. You are absolutely right.
Posted by: replica louis vuitton handbags | September 06, 2011 at 04:00 AM
We have gotten many great comments from our customers and earn a good reputation in foreign makerts, more than 90% customers are satisfied with our products and service, till now our online members are beyond 80,000. As of right now, we Replica Handbags currently serve customers from over 18 countries, and we are still growing. We really hope to expand our business through cooperation with individuals and companies from around the world.
Posted by: chaussures femmes | September 08, 2011 at 04:38 AM
Sorry,i don't know how to receive my response, why?
Christian Louboutin/Shoes/Sale/Cheap/Outlet/UK/Shop/Store/2011/Online/Discount/
http://www.christianlouboutinstoresale.com/
Posted by: Christian Louboutin | September 10, 2011 at 05:16 AM
Sorry,i don't know how to receive my response, why?
http://www.discountmonclerjacketssale.com/
Posted by: Moncler Jackets | September 18, 2011 at 12:28 AM
what's wrong with the people?
Christian Louboutin/Shoes/Sale/Cheap/Outlet/UK/Shop/Store/2011/Online/Discount/
http://www.christianlouboutinshoes-store.com/
Posted by: Christian Louboutin Outlet | September 20, 2011 at 09:54 AM
what's wrong with the people?
Christian Louboutin/Shoes/Sale/Cheap/Outlet/UK/Shop/Store/2011/Online/Discount/
http://www.christianlouboutinsshoesoutlet.com/
Posted by: Christian Louboutin | September 21, 2011 at 04:38 AM
Your article looks great!Thanks for you sharing. I love it. Your article looks great! Thanks for you sharing. I love it.
Posted by: knockoff handbags | October 26, 2011 at 04:42 AM
what's wrong with the people?
http://www.christianlouboutin-highheels.com/
Posted by: Christian Louboutin | November 23, 2011 at 04:47 AM
Very wonderful article, what's wrong with the people?
http://www.coachfactoryonlinesale.com/
Posted by: Coach Outlet | November 26, 2011 at 03:16 AM
this article will guide you in deciding how to advance in your current job, or grow into a new location.
http://www.coachfactoryonlinesale.com/
Posted by: Coach Factory | November 29, 2011 at 04:36 AM