First things first. I have broken down and finally gone on Twitter surrendering to the forces of digital overload. My handle is speechboy71 (surprisingly most variations of Michael Cohen were taken). Please follow me because right now I have 21 followers and that is kind of pathetic - that and I'm intensely curious to know who all the DA readers are out there. Ok, on to the news.
Fascinating read in today's Wall Street Journal about how US troops feel about the counter-insurgency mission they are being asked to perform in Southern Afghanistan.
Among front-line troops, many of them used to
more liberal rules of engagement in Iraq, frustration is boiling over.
"It's like fighting with two hands behind your back," says Sgt. First
Class Samuel Frantz, a platoon sergeant in Capt. Reim's unit, the Charlie
Company of the 1st Battalion of the 12th Infantry Regiment. "We're so
worried about not hurting the population's feelings that we're not doing our
jobs."
"It
doesn't matter if we get killed—we're here to die," says Lt. Mark
Morrison, 24 years old, the leader of the second platoon. "Our lives are
not valuable enough to protect."
As Lt. Morrison's platoon gathered for a patrol,
his soldiers traded gallows humor about losing limbs in coming hours.
"Look at it this way—if you get prosthetic legs, you get to be
taller," one told a shorter comrade-in-arms.
To be sure, this is not the first or last time that soldiers on the frontlines have complained about a mission or engaged in gallows humor, but it does speak to the frustration one has to imagine exists among soldiers who've been taught to be fighters - and are now asked to be armed social workers.
But here's the part of the story that is really concerning:
Capt.
Duke Reim, commander of the American unit responsible for Pashmul, estimates
that about 95% of the locals are Taliban or aid the militants. District Gov.
Niyaz Mohammad Serhadi agrees. "People here are on the side of the
insurgency and have no trust in the government," he says. "Insurgents
are in their villages 24 hours."
Now Pashmul isn't in Helmand, it's in Kandahar
province, but this gets to an issue I raised yesterday - if our overarching
goal in Afghanistan is to protect civilians then why are we waging offensives
in places where a strong segment of the population doesn't want us to be there?
Allow me to answer my own question; because our goal is NOT to protect civilians it's to defeat the Taliban . . . and further US interests. This is hardly a surprise; after all isn't this why most countries go to war - to further their interests. But this fiction that we are in Afghanistan to help the Afghan people is just that: fiction. If tomorrow, the residents of Helmand and Kandahar said "we'd rather live under Taliban rule, US troops get out" do you think we'd actually leave? I don't and the reason is simple; we think it's in our interests to stay. Long ago we decided that defeating the Taliban - and protecting the lives of US citizens - was more important than protecting the lives of Afghan citizens. Otherwise we wouldn't be sending more troops to Afghanistan because no matter how well we play it, as long as 100,000 US troops are on the ground, Afghan civilians are gong to die.
If our goal was to "win the people's trust," the perhaps easiest course would be to leave places like Pasmul or Marjah, but instead we're going to spend blood and treasure to convince them to trust a government and occupying force that they appear to be quite wary of. And that wariness is only likely to grow if Marjah ends up like Fallujah.
I'm sorry but this is no way to fight a war. Either we're in places like Helmand and Kandahar to defeat the insurgency or we're there to protect the civilians. I'm not sure that it's possible to do both. In fact, right now it doesn't seem like we're doing a very good job at either.
Hi,
The subject-matter dealt with should serve to draw attention in every country to the tragic fate of victims, and to the action taken by our Movement to help them. It is therefore felt important to discuss specific problems relating to the protection of the civilian population during armed conflicts, abuses committed against women, the suffering endured by thousands of children, the crucial problem of water shortages and starvation, closely linked to population movements, and the scandalous proliferation of antipersonnel mines. The Conference also offers an opportunity to bear witness, to explain, to arouse compassion, and to encourage rejection of the unacceptable.
Posted by: nintendo ds | February 12, 2010 at 12:15 AM
You are taking an off-hand comment by a soldier as a statistic. It is his impression that 95% of the people support the insurgency. They do not. In this area the majority stay quite, while many village leaders who want to see change are threatened into inaction.
The strategy you propose was tried in Musa Qala in Helmand with the result being not an increase in peace, but an increase in violence and grievances against the government for not protecting the population.
Posted by: Yozhik | February 12, 2010 at 03:15 AM
Don't tell him I said this, but dude you are much smarter than Attackerman. God, he's gone so rah-rah lately. And while all but dismissing Al Qaeda current ability to hurt us. Hello? WTF are doing over there then? Seriously, what business is it of ours -- why are we killing them? I'll absolutely follow your ass on Twitter, bro.
Posted by: Mike D. | February 12, 2010 at 08:50 AM
Either we're in places like Helmand and Kandahar to defeat the insurgency or we're there to protect the civilians. I'm not sure that it's possible to do both. In fact, right now it doesn't seem like we're doing a very good job at either.
Why are pounding this false distinction so hard? It's pretty obvious that the main method we are pursuing as per COMISAF is to separate the insurgency from the civilian population, while not doing anything to bring the two closer together.
In order to separate the two, we have to bring the fight to the enemy in territory it controls. Not sure why you are so confused about that ---the whole point of the strategy is to expand government control over the population while shrinking Taliban control.
Strategy = expand Afghan government control.
Tactic = population control/persuasion through ejecting Taliban forces from the midst of the population and establishing ANSF and NATO forces there instead.
You know: clear, hold, build. We're still in the process of clearing in some places, which sometimes entails civilian casualties. In other places, we are trying to hold and build, which will probably mean a lot less of that if we have the right mix of forces and governance.
I mean, is it really so hard to understand? It's not all population protection, and it's not all killing the enemy.
Posted by: tequila | February 12, 2010 at 01:31 PM
@Yozhik: you're challenging the estimate of the senior Western soldier for a district about how strong an insurgency he's really facing? Do you have anything to base that on other than ideology?
Posted by: BruceR | February 16, 2010 at 08:31 AM
Hi Guy's,
he's gone so rah-rah lately. And while all but dismissing Al Qaeda current ability to hurt us. Hello? WTF are doing over there then? Seriously, what business is it of ours -- why are we killing them?
Posted by: 4gb pro duo | February 17, 2010 at 02:26 AM
If you have PANERAI Watches , I still have my idea to achieve.
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 08:29 PM
I am so with you FRANCK MULLER Watch
Posted by: bvlgari watches | February 26, 2010 at 10:17 PM
Thank You Editors..sesli sohbet sesli chat
Posted by: sesli sohbet | March 10, 2010 at 04:49 PM
You know: clear, hold, build. We're still in the process of clearing in some places, which sometimes entails civilian casualties. In other places, we are trying to hold and build, which will probably mean a lot less of that if we have the right mix of forces and governance.
sesli chat sesli sohbet
Posted by: sesli sohbet | March 23, 2010 at 01:09 PM
We all know these years china pallet racking in china develop very fast, now the design capacity of racking is very strong in china.
You can see every kind of china racking in china, includingDrive in racking,
cantilever racking, shelving,Longspan shelving, dexion racking,. We also have very experienced engineer to do the design and instlaation job.
as a whole contractor for refrigeration equipment, design, manufacturing, installation of cold store
Posted by: shelving | March 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Yellow lens of Ray ban wayfarer can 100% filter UV, allowing infrared and 83% visible light through the lens.
Its greatest feature is that you can filter the sun's most dazzling blue.
Sunlight through the atmosphere, the most performance is the blue light, which is why you see the sky is blue. Yellow lens filters blue light, the natural scenery can be seen more clearly. So driving with a yellow lens Ray ban 2010 sunglasses, you can more clearly see from the vehicle.
Ray ban sunglasses sale
ray ban 2010 sunglasses sale
ray ban sunglasses sale
ray ban wayfarer message from http://www.eyewear-rayban.com
Posted by: ray ban 2010 sunglasses | April 06, 2010 at 05:46 AM
We don't take the luxury route, just playing crazy exaggeration and assertive personality. In addition we break the traditional and innovative stainless steel bracelet, stainless steel rings and so on. Our stainless steel jewelry has great stage effects. The color, texture and design are very fashion. The breakthrough in molding achieves the strong sense of art stainless steel jewelry. It experiences a foreign land and customs, tracking the trend of the international fashion accessories. Our company welcomes the large stainless steel jewelry wholesalers to e-mail consultation.
E-mail: sus360@hotmail.com
website: http://www.sus360.com
Posted by: stianless steel rings | April 13, 2010 at 10:54 PM
In a woman’s dress, the jewelry is unique; there is only one role— let a woman be more elegant, attractive and beautiful. But, one thing I can make a sure: An elegant woman, even if links of londonshe loved jewelry, but also must not be too obsessed with this, so that confused his whole body from top links of london sale to bottom are hanging ornaments, like a Christmas tree.
Posted by: huo638671 | May 03, 2010 at 03:33 AM
Doctor told me the foot cramps and frequent colds are due to chemo. Still hurts where I sit.
Posted by: Teknoloji | May 11, 2010 at 08:40 AM
Normal activities are not enough. I can run 1/2 of a short block, slowly. I am 55 now and bike everywhere.
Posted by: Kralseks | May 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM
supersiniz hafiz ya hayran oldum valla şarkı sözleri - teoman şarkı sözleri - emre aydın şarkı sözleri - sagopa kajmer şarkı sözleri
Posted by: şarkı sözleri | May 31, 2010 at 01:00 PM
seslisohbet siteleri arasında ekol bir adres sestonum hemen sohbette başlamak icin sestonum 'tıklayınız..! seslisohbet ve seslichat adreslerinin gözdesi hemen tıklayarak seslisohbet yapmaya başlaya bilirsiniz..!
sestonum
seslichat
seslisohbet
Posted by: TıkLa-SohbeT | June 16, 2010 at 08:17 PM
Türkiyenin ilk Hiphop Sitesi Hiphop, Gekko G Fan Sitesi Gekko G, Mask animasyon thank you very good site
Posted by: QodesQoM | June 23, 2010 at 01:48 PM
Oh God you are a genius person and a good photographer i like your pics thanks.
Posted by: Hermes Designer Handbags | November 28, 2010 at 08:53 PM
i am glad to study your opinion. m41414 Keepall 55, m41416 Keepall 50, m41522 Speedy 40, m41528 Speedy 25, 219704, m40249 artsy mm, m40259 artsy gm, M45257 Messenger Bag, M40156 Neverfull MM, m40144 Tivoli GM
Posted by: knockoff handbags | April 20, 2011 at 12:25 AM
You are taking an off-hand comment by a soldier as a statistic. It is his impression that 95% of the people support the insurgency. They do not. In this area the majority stay quite, while many vi
Posted by: 冷夜 | April 21, 2011 at 02:13 AM
Back in July of 2009, President Obama spoke before he knew all the facts when he said that Officer James Crowley acted “stupidly” when he arrested Henry Gates at his home. Jon Bruning may have spoke before he was aware of all the information when he said that Sokol did nothing criminal. Of course since our country’s judicial system is predicated with the idea that you are innocent until proven guilty, Bruning’s comment is not that far off base.
Posted by: Pandora Braclets | May 28, 2011 at 03:23 AM
These are wonderful! Thank you for sharing
Posted by: Oakley Sunglasses | August 08, 2011 at 05:27 AM
Jon Bruning may have spoke before he was aware of all the information when he said that Sokol did nothing criminal. Of course since our country’s liseli porno judicial system is predicated with the idea that you are innocent until proven guilty, Bruning’s comment is not that far off base.
Posted by: seks shop | September 09, 2011 at 05:43 AM
Great Site, your plugins are very useful and save me a tonne of time.
Posted by: replica handbags | December 21, 2011 at 10:30 AM