What Royce Reveals about Pakistan's Interests
Posted by Patrick Barry
Congressman Royce wonders whether the Pakistani intelligence service is making presumptions about its support for militant groups in Afghanistan that are in fact not in its interests. Sec. Clinton agrees, but points out that she has witnessed a remarkable shift in Pakistan's security calculus, evidenced by their offensives in Swat and South Waziristan against the Pakistani Taliban and the TNSM. I'm slightly amused by this, because it seems like that shift in calculus coincided exactly with the period in which those militant groups began targeting Pakistani institutions with much more ferocity. So from that perspective, Pakistan has been perfectly consistent in the way it calculates its interests! When it feels threatened, it responds. When it isn't threatened, it sits back. As long as the Afghan Taliban doesn't threaten the Pakistani state (and there's no clear indication that it does, or will), why should the Pakistanis take strong action against them?
Hi,
When Pakistan was threatened Pakistan decided it was best to side with you. Now that you are stuck isn’t it interesting how Pakistan has striking “peace deals” and attacks within Afghanistan are intensifying.
Posted by: glucosamine | January 01, 2010 at 04:18 AM
Thank you for your sharing.! seslichat seslisohbet
Posted by: muhtar | January 12, 2010 at 06:03 AM
Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!
Posted by: cheap coach handbags | January 26, 2010 at 02:11 AM
Great comments! You are so nice, man! You never know how much i like'em!
Posted by: cheap coach bags | January 26, 2010 at 09:08 PM
Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!
Posted by: cheap coach purses | January 27, 2010 at 07:33 PM