Copenhagen and the Future of International Cooperation
Posted by David Shorr
Over at RealClearWorld's The Compass blog, Greg Scoblete weaves together thoughts from Les Gelb, Walter Russell Mead, and himself to glean what the Copenhagen summit tells us about the prospects and limits of future international cooperation. While Gelb and Mead give astute analyses of the dynamics between different players and blocs at the summit itself, Scoblete's own piece from back in July does an especially good job at juxtaposing the hopes and ambitions of the Obama administration against the diplomatic messiness of trying to get things done:
Time and time again, the vision of America rallying the world to confront common dangers blurs into the less-than-thrilling reality of a world with more important things to do. This should not surprise anyone. During the Cold War, when U.S. leadership was arguably at its apex, even allied nations (most famously France) bucked America's will. While the Obama administration has sought to paint the 21st century's threats in menacing terms, climate change and nuclear proliferation haven't quite sharpened as many minds as the Red Army.
This, then, is the terminus of America's global leadership. If the U.S. proceeds along the course set by the Obama administration and defines leadership as the ability to bring other nations along its preferred path, then they should be prepared to define success down. "Solving" the world's problems, as Secretary Clinton suggested, is altogether a bridge too far. Instead, finding a globally acceptable, lowest-common-denominator outcome will be the order of the day (and even that won't be easy).
This captures the dynamic quite nicely. It's not that other nations necessarily have sharply divergent interests or are fundamentally at cross purposes with us. They're at least faintly aware of common global interests -- enough to be dragged along, if not serve as full problem-solving partners. Scoblete is correct that appeals to urgency have yet to concentrate the minds of others, and yet I'm reluctant to "define success down." On the one hand, the lowest common denominator could yield slow and steady progress, as Greg predicts; on the other hand, the price of watering down our collective responses could be steps that fall short of alleviating the problems at hand.
The discussion is aimed at demonstrating the self-interest case for governments to act – why there is a strong strategic motive for governments to be pioneers and, conversely, a risk to being the laggards. The discussion will also highlight the emerging importance of biocapacity as a valuable national asset....
Posted by: valentines day gift ideas | December 23, 2009 at 04:00 AM
OK, that sounds like a strategy.
Posted by: David Shorr | December 23, 2009 at 11:01 AM
I really appreciate the kind of topics you post here. Thanks for sharing us a great information that is actually helpful. Good day!
Posted by: Tiffany | December 25, 2009 at 03:10 AM
Thanks u admins. good msj
Posted by: kabin | December 25, 2009 at 08:01 AM
http://www.t-racking.com racking
http://www.racking-shelving.com shelving
professional racking & shelving manufacturer, pallet racking, drive in racking,
cantilever racking, longspan shelving, dexion racking,
Posted by: racking | December 29, 2009 at 09:07 AM
Thank you for your article.
Looking For discount louis vuitton handbags? The store online sells the louis vuitton bags. Welcome to visit and buy lv handbags.
Posted by: lv handbags | January 06, 2010 at 09:09 AM
Thank you for your sharing.! seslichat seslisohbet
Posted by: muhtar | January 11, 2010 at 05:26 PM
Instead of cowering in front of our enemies, the tougher, more resolute and inherentlynightfall ugg more patriotic approach would be to say it doesn't matter how many terrorists al Qaeda sends our way, we're going to remain steadfast in our system of governance, way of life, and uphold the values that make America great while keeping our country safe. And making sure America, not al Qaeda, dictates the course of which this process takes is central to that.
nightfall ugg boots
Posted by: hhgjgjh | January 12, 2010 at 03:50 AM
Hi,
Thank you very much for great article.Really if cooperation can be achieved in Copenhagen, I think there's a good chance to set a precedent for long-term global cooperation on many challenges, including food security, financial regulation, trade imbalances, regional security, and counterterrorism.
Posted by: buy r4 | January 23, 2010 at 12:25 AM
Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!
Posted by: cheap coach handbags | January 26, 2010 at 02:02 AM
Great comments! You are so nice, man! You never know how much i like'em!
Posted by: cheap coach bags | January 26, 2010 at 08:38 PM
Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!
Posted by: cheap coach purses | January 27, 2010 at 07:16 PM