Democracy Arsenal

« The Part Where I Strenuously Disagree with Tom Ricks | Main | Afghanistan Mission Creep Watch »

July 14, 2009

Scoblic v. Krauthammer
Posted by David Shorr

Peter Scoblic offers an excellent retort in The New Republic to Charles Krauthammer's recent hyperventilation over missile defense. Scoblic points out the folly of pursuing technology for its own sake and reminds us of the precarious balance of terror associated with nuclear weapons. These are not totems of military or technical prowess, they are enormously, uniquely destructive instruments of catastrophe. The utmost priority of any policy, therefore, is to keep them from being used. And as Scoblic rightly emphasizes, it's all about deterrence and everyone being confident that their own ability to retaliate for an attack will discourage the other guy. Any attempt to gain an advantage could give an adversary an itchy trigger finger -- not good. Since the New York Times recently traced President Obama's attitudes back to college days in the early 1980s, let me add a generational note. For many of us who came of age in the nuclear freeze movement, this issue of undermining deterrence and upsetting the balance of terror was the main worry.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20115710ecdd1970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Scoblic v. Krauthammer:

Comments

Charles Krauthammer has an outdated view about deterrence and why the Cold War ended. Krauthammer believes in the myth that Reagan's Star Wars program ended the Cold War, but this viewpoint has been thoughly discredited by various historians. While Scoblic realizes that the Cold War ended due to talks with the Soviet Union and the signing of the INF treaty which greatly eased any Soviet fears that the West was out to gain nuclear superiority.

Congress should create an independent blue-ribbon panel or similar body to investigate a host of previously unreviewable activities of the Bush administration, including its detention, interrogation and surveillance programs. Only by chronicling and confronting the past in a comprehensive, bipartisan fashion can we reclaim our moral authority and establish a credible path forward to meet the complex challenges of a post-Sept. 11 world. replica rolex
Rolex Watches
Tag Heuer Watches

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

Great comments! You are so nice, man! You never know how much i like'em!

Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!

Hi,
I think it will not right to call Scoblic a conservative, especially since he just wrote a book blaming conservatives for everything that's gone wrong in US foreign policy for the last half century....

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Guest Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use