How Much Of Moises Naim's Minilateralism Could We Really Have?
Posted by David Shorr
The question of how the nations of the world will mount collective responses to urgent problems -- or even whether they will -- is a critical issue, and Foreign Policy Editor Moises Naim gave his own proposal in the recently published issue. Like any good entrepreneurial public intellectual, he even branded it with a catchy name. For Naim, "minilateralism" would, for a given international challenge, bring together the top tier of countries with leverage over that problem. The result would be a profusion of 'G' groupings with rotating casts of members. Clearly intergovernmental cooperation in the 21st Century will be spread across many forums and arrangements, with varying degrees of permanence or legal formality. I have my doubts, though, about Naim's notion of numerous parallel tracks, particularly at a practical level.
Setting those aside, for the moment, Naim basically has the right big-picture diagnosis. The dearth of landmark international agreements in the last 10-15 years is stark indeed, given the seriousness of the problems we confront. It's also true that negotiating among the entire world community of 192 nations is, in most cases, neither necessary nor workable (any of us who lived through Kofi Annan's valiant 2004-05 UN reform push knows that from hard experience). Naim is right too in looking toward pivotal countries for policy leadership. Of all the responses to Naim from Foreign Policy bloggers, I like the two posts from David Rothkopf, who coined a neat term of his own: "coalitions of the influential."
Where the argument loses me is the proposed proliferation of G groupings. Like Naim, I view 'the Gs' -- and by extension their paradigm of informal yet regular series of consultations -- as a hopeful and under-tapped locus of international cooperation and action. As I argue in a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette op-ed today, the true comparative advantage of the Gs stems from the summit meetings around which they revolve. So where I diverge from Naim is the question of how many different Gs we can really have. In practical terms, I'm not sure what volume of diplomatic activity will be possible. And given the potential constraints, I want to husband our high-level attention and action in one place and apply it to problems from economic growth to non-proliferation as need and opportunity arises. If, on the other hand, we see heightened concern and political push from leaders and a new plenitude of diplomacy, then I'll be a staunch proponent of minilateralism. It's an issue on which I'd be happy to be wrong.
I must say this is a great article i enjoyed reading it keep the
good work.
Posted by: supra shoes | July 14, 2009 at 02:27 AM
Thank you.Hot Shoes Cheap Jordan shoes michael jordan shoes and are on sale-Free shipping.
Posted by: michael jordan shoes | January 08, 2010 at 02:44 AM
This is very beauty article, I like it, thank you!
To the word you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world.
Posted by: Ugg london | January 13, 2010 at 02:42 AM
Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!
Posted by: cheap coach handbags | January 26, 2010 at 12:32 AM
Great comments! You are so nice, man! You never know how much i like'em!
Posted by: cheap coach bags | January 27, 2010 at 12:17 AM
Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!
Posted by: cheap coach purses | January 27, 2010 at 08:59 PM
As the business grows, rolex replica has also jumped into an international brand. It is worth mentioning that, replica rolex paypal is the ancestor of today's brand-oriented, in order to protect the quality and brand name will be printed on their products, the history of fashion in the world, is the first one first. replica watches, rolex replica, fake rolex watches.
Posted by: replica rolex watches | January 28, 2010 at 12:17 AM
Hi,
Naim’s essay is the latest volley in a debate on “big” or “small” multilateral action should be; however, although he and other bloggers do a good job setting out the advantages of “minilateralism,” the issues of normativity and legality are all but ignored.
Posted by: acekards | February 26, 2010 at 12:10 AM
Never frown ,when you are sad ,because you never know who is falling in love with your smile
Posted by: watches sale | March 16, 2010 at 03:34 AM
swiss rolex fake grade AAA has also jumped into an international brand. It is worth
mentioning that
Posted by: donglei | April 28, 2010 at 10:22 PM
you’ll be in my reading list!
Posted by: sexy costumes | May 13, 2010 at 08:45 AM
There is no black and white colors, such as gray and red like a timeless classic, and eventually replica handbagsbecome worse, Homme Dior, black A06 wake up call, the foreigners rouge, further improve the design of the initial sales to noble pure deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) Homme Dior, Dior men will bring clean ao in front of us the overall structure, surrounded by a black dial, simplereplica handbags and stylish design style spirit of Dior Homme.
Posted by: replica handbags | May 14, 2010 at 12:16 AM
Where the argument loses me is the proposed proliferation of G groupings. Like Naim, I view 'the Gs' -- and by extension their paradigm of informal yet regular series of consultations -- as a hopeful and under-tapped locus of international cooperation and action
seslisohbet
seslichat
Posted by: sesli sohbet | June 29, 2010 at 03:17 PM
y did a majchanel handbagsority pick above 5 or below 5. And in fact a significant majority chose gucci handbagsnumbers between 4-6 with the overall mean being 4.3. This reflects a real ambivalence. The issue seems to be that in all three countries the pophermes handbagsulation overwhelmingly disapprove of Al Qaeda's tactics of attacking American civilians, who are in the United States or Muslim countries wilouis vuitton handbagsth less then 10% approving of attacks on civilians. On the other hand, there is a lot of resentment towards U.S. policies and edesigner handbagsspecially our military posture in the Middle Eas
Posted by: chanel handbags | July 11, 2010 at 11:33 PM