Why Does the GOP Support Ahmadinejad?
Posted by Adam Blickstein
Contrast this:
Rep. Pence and Republican Leaders to Hold Press Conference Supporting Iranian Dissidents
Washington – House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence and other House Leaders will hold a press conference today, June 18th at 1:45 p.m. in the House Radio/TV Gallery, H-321, the U.S. Capitol to discuss the current situation in Iran and a resolution Rep. Pence introduced supporting the Iranian dissidents.
Washington – House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence and other House Leaders will hold a press conference today, June 18th at 1:45 p.m. in the House Radio/TV Gallery, H-321, the U.S. Capitol to discuss the current situation in Iran and a resolution Rep. Pence introduced supporting the Iranian dissidents.
With this:
But in conversations with friends and relatives in
Tehran this week, I've heard the opposite of what I had expected: a
resounding belief that this time the United States should keep out. One
of my cousins, a woman in her mid-30s who has been attending the daily
protests along with the rest of her family, viewed the situation
pragmatically. “The U.S. shouldn't interfere, because a loud
condemnation isn't going to affect Iranian domestic politics one way or
the other. If the supreme leader decides to crackdown on the protests
and Ahmadinejad stays in power, then negotiations with the United
States might improve our lives.”
Other friends I spoke with cited various reasons why the United States should maintain its discrete posture. “If Obama's position until now has been to respect Iran, then he really has no choice but to watch first how things unfold. Mousavi hasn't produced any facts yet, no one has produced evidence of fraud,” said my friend Ali, a 40-year-old photographer. “That's what is needed before Obama takes a major stand.”
My older relatives fretted particularly that any real criticism by the United States would be used as a pretext by Ahmadinejad to blame the protests on “outside enemies,” a reflexive response for the president when dealing with even housing inflation and the rising price of tomatoes. “It's better for Obama to stay out of this. Given what happened with Bush in Florida, Ahmadinejad can always claim the United States is in no position to lecture anyone about fair elections,” my aunt noted.
Other friends I spoke with cited various reasons why the United States should maintain its discrete posture. “If Obama's position until now has been to respect Iran, then he really has no choice but to watch first how things unfold. Mousavi hasn't produced any facts yet, no one has produced evidence of fraud,” said my friend Ali, a 40-year-old photographer. “That's what is needed before Obama takes a major stand.”
My older relatives fretted particularly that any real criticism by the United States would be used as a pretext by Ahmadinejad to blame the protests on “outside enemies,” a reflexive response for the president when dealing with even housing inflation and the rising price of tomatoes. “It's better for Obama to stay out of this. Given what happened with Bush in Florida, Ahmadinejad can always claim the United States is in no position to lecture anyone about fair elections,” my aunt noted.
Why does the GOP insist on playing into the hands of the very oppressive regime they feign to be denouncing? Why do they continue to provide Ahmadinejad with the propaganda needed to further suppress the Iranian people? Why do they continue to place partisan, domestic politics over the well-being and future of the Iranian people?
GOP please stay away from Iranian elections. First, Romney blamed Obama for the reelection of Ahmadinejab and now the party of no wants to claim responsibilty for the revolution in Iran, what a bunch of pathetic opportunitic losers. Please come up with ideas to help the country instead of destroying it. Obama's Cairo speech deserves credit for this revolt in Iran.
Posted by: Riz | June 18, 2009 at 01:20 PM
It could be because they think a policy of cowering in fear of bogus accusations from the recent beneficiary of a stolen election is unworthy of the United States.
Posted by: Zathras | June 18, 2009 at 01:28 PM
Why does the GOP insist on playing into the hands of the very oppressive regime they feign to be denouncing? Why do they continue to provide Ahmadinejad with the propaganda needed to further suppress the Iranian people? Why do they continue to place partisan, domestic politics over the well-being and future of the Iranian people?
Because the GOP has not the slightest interest in the Iranian people; nor are they really interested in encouraging change in Iran. But they see an opportunity to beat their breasts and score domestic political points, and are taking it.
Posted by: Dan Kervick | June 18, 2009 at 01:56 PM
Ideas are like the stars --- we never reach them, but like mariners, we chart our course by them.
Posted by: cheap jordan shoes | June 18, 2009 at 10:27 PM
good
Posted by: cheap jordan shoes | June 18, 2009 at 10:27 PM
Great comments! You are so nice, man! You never know how much i like'em!
Posted by: cheap coach bags | January 27, 2010 at 12:33 AM
Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!
Posted by: cheap coach purses | January 27, 2010 at 09:29 PM
Hi,
In fact, Middle East analysts like Juan Cole believe that Bush's public statements helped Ahmadinejad win his surprise victory over his more moderate opponents...
Posted by: dstt | March 03, 2010 at 12:19 AM
GOP please stay away from Iranian elections. First, Romney blamed Obama for the reelection of Ahmadinejab and now the party of no wants to claim responsibilty for the revolution in Iran, what a bunch of pathetic opportunitic losers. Please come up with ideas to help the country instead of destroying it.
Thank You For sesli sohbet seslisohbet Sesli Chat
Posted by: SesliChat | March 23, 2010 at 08:44 PM
Thank you, I got it. o(∩_∩)o
Posted by: NFL jerseys | May 12, 2010 at 02:49 AM
every interesting to read.I enjoyed well while reading.I will recommend my friends to read this one for sure.
Posted by: wholesale wigs | May 13, 2010 at 09:16 AM
There is no black and white colors, such as gray and red like a timeless classic, and eventually replica handbagsbecome worse, Homme Dior, black A06 wake up call, the foreigners rouge, further improve the design of the initial sales to noble pure deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) Homme Dior, Dior men will bring clean ao in front of us the overall structure, surrounded by a black dial, simplereplica handbags and stylish design style spirit of Dior Homme.
Posted by: replica handbags | May 14, 2010 at 12:59 AM
SesLiSohbeT siteleri arasında ekol bir adres SesTonum hemen sohbette başlamak icin SesTonum 'tıklayınız..! SesLiSohbeT Ve SesLiChaT adreslerinin gözdesi hemen tıklayarak SesLiSohbeT yapmaya başlaya bilirsiniz..!
SesTonum
SesLiChaT
SesLiSohbeT
Posted by: TıkLa-SohbeT | June 25, 2010 at 10:34 AM
Why do they continue to provide Ahmadinejad with the propaganda needed to further suppress the Iranian people? Why do they continue to place partisan, domestic politics over the well-being and future of the Iranian people
seslisohbet
seslichat
Posted by: sesli sohbet | June 27, 2010 at 04:13 PM
retz's achanel handbagsrguments are in all likelihood baseless. (You wonder why Paretz didn't feel gucci handbagslike reading consulting Sick or Cole's blogs before he posted? Their analyhermes handbagsses were available hours before his) Sullivan said it best - only alouis vuitton handbags neocon would "desire an Ahamadinejad victory," but he forgets to add that only a neocon argue a point that so cynically justidesigner handbagsfied his ideological perspective, in the face of sweeping evidence to the
Posted by: chanel handbags | July 11, 2010 at 10:57 PM