The Militarization of US Foreign Policy - Sign # 643
Posted by Michael Cohen
Apparently nearly a million Pakistanis have been displaced by the government's military attacks on the Taliban in the Swat Valley and not surprisingly the United States is providing humanitarian assistance. What is perhaps surprising (or maybe should be) is who is doling out the assistance - the Pentagon. Spencer Ackerman over at the WINDY blog poses a reasonable query:
The question, though, is when the Defense Department isn’t going to retain the exclusive capability to provide this aid.
Secretaries Hillary Rodham Clinton and Bob Gates have both talked about bolstering the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development’s capacity to take on the provision of non-military assistance. I hesitate to criticize, since we’re talking about the well-being of roughly a million people — a concern that eclipses bureaucratic box-checking — but there’s always going to be some important priority that comes before interagency reform. And in this case, the State Department has a more established presence in the country than the Defense Department does.
True enough. This is not a time to be arguing over which is the best agency to be offering humanitarian assistance, but really shouldn't this be AID's job? We've seen a lot of talk about the need for a less-military focused US response to Pakistan's problems. Wouldn't the empowering of our civilian agencies be a worthwhile step in that direction; particularly when as Spencer points out they already have a fairly robust presence in the country? This is what happens when you keep weakening the country's civilian agencies.
Way to go, USA
news report:
The human exodus from the war-torn Swat valley in northern Pakistan is turning into the world's most dramatic displacement crisis since the Rwandan genocide of 1994, the UN refugee agency warned.
A Pakistani military offensive against Taliban militants in their Swat valley bastion has forced more than a million people from their homes, the government and the United Nations say.
Almost 1.5 million people have registered for assistance since fighting erupted three weeks ago, the UNHCR said, bringing the total number of war displaced in North West Frontier province to more than 2 million, not including 300,000 the provincial government believes have not registered. "It's been a long time since there has been a displacement this big," the UNHCR's spokesman Ron Redmond said in Geneva, trying to recall the last time so many people had been uprooted so quickly. "It could go back to Rwanda."
Posted by: Don Bacon | May 19, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Some questions to ask yourself:
1) After you take away the maintenance and operations of U.S. embassies, exactly how much money does State (which AID is a part of) have?
2) How robust is State and AID's organic logistical capability? In order words, how many planes, boats, and cars does State and AID own itself, without having to borrow from other USG agencies?
The answer to these questions is 1) very little and 2) even less. You see a lot of green suiters performing these humanitarian missions in Pakistan and elsewhere (called Operations Other than War, or OOTW, in the 1990s) not because they want to, but because the military is often the only U.S. entity that can. This is a reason why Secretary Gates made so many headlines by stating publically that more MONEY needs to be spent on State & USAID. Part of that was the realization that DoD can't and shouldn't do it all.
But having the less-than-desired person complete the mission is better than having no one complete the mission. Despite it's claims to the contrary, State and AID have been woefully inadequate is having the right people with the right skill sets and right ATTITUDE to want to go to some of these places and provide long-term operations.
One of the reasons the military took so many billets for the Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) in Afghanistan back in 2007/2008 was not because the military wanted to "own" the PRT program, but because State and other civilian agencies couldn't or wouldn't pony up the bodies to fill them. Then they had the nerve to complain to Congress that they couldn't send people to PRTs because the military was taking up all of the billets!
If someone in uniform is told to get their ass on a plane and be prepared to go and provide relief in Pakistan or some other god-forsaken part of the world, they salute smartly and carry out their mission until properly relieved. Civilian world? Not so much. Many folks in uniform, who spend on average over 12 months at a time on deployments in Afghanistan and Iraq, couldn't help but notice the mini-revolt during the State Department town hall meeting in the fall of 2007 when the idea of forced, 6-12 month assignments to Kabul and Baghdad was floated.
It’s going to take a fundamental change in spending and personnel priorities, coupled with a good incentive program to send the right civilians to spearhead these types of missions. Change which, by the way, won't be fixed in a news cycle or one fiscal year. Otherwise, you’re going to have the military being tasked to again perform outside of its lane in lieu of civilians, all the while being criticized for the “militarization” of U.S. foreign policy.
Posted by: JDB | May 19, 2009 at 01:39 PM
I think this policy move is interesting especially the incorporation of text donations. The administration can't just let the situation in Pakistan escalate by they don't have the option of getting directly involved this is a good and helpful middle ground. This video is interesting check it out for more details: http://www.newsy.com/videos/u_s_sends_aid_for_pakistani_refugees
Posted by: Rosa | May 20, 2009 at 02:55 PM
Thank you very much. I am wonderring if I can share your article in the bookmarks of society,Then more friends can talk about this problem.
Posted by: Lotro gold | May 21, 2009 at 05:25 AM
US foreign policy is so ineffective because it has been taken over by the military. Even postwar reconstruction in Iraq under the US-led occupation was run by the Pentagon rather than by civilian agencies....
Posted by: valentines day gift ideas | January 07, 2010 at 05:13 AM
Great comments! You are so nice, man! You never know how much i like'em!
Posted by: cheap coach bags | January 27, 2010 at 01:21 AM
Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!
Posted by: cheap coach purses | January 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM
Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!
Posted by: cheap coach purses | January 27, 2010 at 10:21 PM
The human exodus from the war-torn Swat valley in northern Pakistan is turning into the world's most dramatic displacement crisis since the Rwandan genocide of 1994, the UN refugee agency warned.
seslisohbet
seslichat
Posted by: sesli sohbet | June 20, 2010 at 04:02 PM
True enough. This is not a time to be arguing over which is the best agency to be offering humanitarian assistance, but really shouldn't this be AID's job? We've seen a lot of talk about the need for a less-military focused US response to Pakistan's problems. Wouldn't the empowering of our civilian agencies be a worthwhile step in that direction; particularly when as Spencer points out they already have a fairly robust presence in the country? This is what happens when you keep weakening the country's civilian agencies.
seslichat
seslisohbet
Posted by: sesli sohbet | June 20, 2010 at 04:03 PM
and portableWhen importingGucci handbagshas the ambitious and portable
algorithms for The Smart PackageMetallic yarnWhen importing and portable
solving adequately has the ambitiouslouis vuittonthe problemWhen importing
Posted by: fengye0528 | June 29, 2010 at 08:48 PM
True enough. This is not a time to be arguing over which is the best agency to be offering humanitarian assistance, but really shouldn't this be AID's job?
Posted by: gucci bags | August 13, 2010 at 04:00 AM
Are you fighting in Final Fantasy XIV for FFXIV Gil or Final Fantasy XIV Gil?
Can you suffer yourself being called newbie in FFXIV Gil game?
Are you seeking unofficial Buy FFXIV Gil cheats or Final Fantasy XIV guides in order to make Final Fantasy XIV Gil faster?
Can you get millions of Cheap FFXIV Gil in one day?
Even if you know how to farm Buy Final Fantasy XIV Gil you have to prepare enough Final Fantasy XIV Power Leveling first to buy height class Final Fantasy XIV Items, to upgrade your Final Fantasy XIV characters.
FF14 Gil Then why not Buy FFXIV Gil from us?
In Final Fantasy XIV it's the fastest way FF14 Gil,for you to get rich. We are online 24 hours a day ready and 7 days one week to power up your FFXIV Gil accounts with FFXIV Gil. Here is the best place for the Final Fantasy XIV Online players to buy your Final Fantasy XIV Gil.
We are the professional website in FFXIV GIL sale.FFXIV GIL here,We are professional FFXIV Power Leveling online. We update price every single day to make sure we are the lowest in the market.(we don't compare price with scam sites which uses unbelievable low price to deceive.)
Our slogan:Cheapest price, Fastest delivery, Best service! Final Fantasy XIV GIL
In the 2 years we are in this field , FFXIV GILbuilt many business with tens of thousands of customers. They are very satisfied with our service.So if you want to get a log of Cheap FFXIV Gil ,no doubt ,come to our website to buy. Our customer service is ready for you on line now!(WWW,GM MMO,COM Sell FFXIV Gil)
Posted by: FFXIV Gil | August 20, 2010 at 02:33 PM
well! i like this interesting post,thank you your sharing!
Posted by: 3g modem | September 02, 2010 at 05:13 AM
It is very nice for you to share your article to bloggers. I found that your article is so constructive and full with life wisdom. You must be a really mature guy!
Posted by: air jordans | October 28, 2010 at 04:14 AM
All for one, one for all.
Posted by: air yeezys | November 06, 2010 at 02:19 AM
i am glad to study your opinion. m41414 Keepall 55, m41416 Keepall 50, m41522 Speedy 40, m41528 Speedy 25, 219704, m40249 artsy mm, m40259 artsy gm, M45257 Messenger Bag, M40156 Neverfull MM, m40144 Tivoli GM
Posted by: wholesale replica handbags | April 23, 2011 at 01:17 AM
It does seem that everybody is into this kind of stuff lately.
Posted by: discount weddingdress | June 29, 2011 at 03:32 AM