The Education of Doug Feith
Posted by Patrick Barry
It's not at all surprising to read today's New York Times opinion section and find that Doug Feith continues to be a font of lazy thinking. This time he uses the tragic bombing of a shrine to Pashtun Poet Rhaman Baba to outline his scheme for countering Islamic extremism through a public diplomacy initiative patterned after Radio Free Europe:
The United States conducted impressive strategic communications during the cold war. Radio Free Europe, Voice of America and other programs conveyed information and ideas that contributed to the discrediting and ultimate defeat of Soviet communism.
Strategic communications directed at the Muslim World, patterned after Radio Free Europe? Sorry Doug, maybe you shuld have gotten involved with al-Hurra, the Bush administration's attempt to replicate the success of Cold-War era public diplomacy, but which has been widely regarded as a sham by the Muslim world.
There is unquestionably a need for the U.S. to update its public diplomacy infrastructure. But to do it via analogies that show no appreciation for the complexities of the audience we're trying to reach, such as how a conservative, sometimes violent strand of Islam reacts with longstanding political and juridical grievances (see Joshua White discuss the current state of affairs in Swat), is just not the way to go.
Those who advocate transforming U.S. International
Broadcasting/Internet/Television into nothing more
than "strategic communications" seem to be not only
badly mis-informed about the history behind Voice of
America, which has continued to operate (despite
frequent periods of pressure) based on clearly-stated
journalistic principles, but also fail to recognize
that to a great degree even newly-created "entities"
are also committed to doing so.
Whether it's under President Obama, or any future
administration, the United States can have a structure
that transmits propaganda to folks overseas (whether
it's in the Swat Valley, Kenya, or Cambodia) designed
to "win hearts and minds", or one that wins respect by
adhering to sound journalistic principles and news
gathering approaches.
The muddying of the waters by proponents of STRATCOMM
in which they suggest that the U.S. would be better
off by "coordinating" messages (a code word for forcing
VOA and others to accept intensified and probably heavy-
handed programming guidance from the State Department
and likely Pentagon) is also trying to advance an
objective pursued for decades of destroying exactly
the kind of government-funded but journalism-based
operations that still serve us well.
Posted by: dxace1 | April 03, 2009 at 01:39 PM
The muddying of the waters by proponents of STRATCOMM
Posted by: Replica Kooba Bags | April 20, 2009 at 08:42 PM
The muddying of the waters by proponents of STRATCOMM
Posted by: fake Gucci Ring | April 29, 2009 at 03:58 AM
Thanks for sharing
Posted by: timberlandboots | June 06, 2009 at 04:16 AM
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
Posted by: cheap jordan shoes | June 16, 2009 at 11:56 PM
I have read your article, I think very popular with this article.
Posted by: nike sb | June 16, 2009 at 11:56 PM
In runeup.com you can buy rs money,and also we have cheap rs powerleveling,you can play very well with these.
Posted by: cheap rs powerleveling | July 17, 2009 at 02:40 AM
Thanks, helpful source.
Posted by: us drugstore | September 13, 2009 at 03:25 PM
I believe too that there is unquestionably a need for the U.S. to update its public diplomacy infrastructure.
Posted by: furniture stores | November 21, 2009 at 11:20 PM
Congress should create an independent blue-ribbon panel or similar body to investigate a host of previously unreviewable activities of the Bush administration, including its detention, interrogation and surveillance programs. Only by chronicling and confronting the past in a comprehensive, bipartisan fashion can we reclaim our moral authority and establish a credible path forward to meet the complex challenges of a post-Sept. 11 world. replica rolex
Rolex Watches
Tag Heuer Watches
Posted by: rolex replica | December 27, 2009 at 08:03 AM