CT, COIN, and Working out the Difference
Posted by Patrick Barry
One of the maddening aspects of Afghanistan and Pakistan's worsening security environment is historical overlap between insurgent and terrorist elements, but different, even contradictory responses for addressing the two threats.
You see this chiefly in the way people sometimes confuse the Taliban with al-Qaeda, despite one being a localized insurgency, and the other a transnational terrorist group. Past relationships, and our own questionable assumptions make it difficult to separate the two, even though they have have different motivations, share different goals, and require different responses. That said, I think George Packer's concern over yesterday's revelation that the U.S. Special forces are training Pakistan's Frontier Corps is somewhat misplaced:
What’s wrong with this picture? Have a look at the Army and Marine Corps counterinsurgency field manual, written under the leadership of General Petraeus. What experts call the kill-capture model was exactly the wrong approach to take during the early years of the Iraq war. This kind of emphasis always ends up creating more new enemies than it can eliminate old ones. Only when the military changed its strategy to protecting the population did the war in Iraq take a turn for the better.
There's a real need to disaggregate here. Kill-capture is the wrong way for the U.S. to fight a full-blown insurgency, but it does occasionally fall within the kit of counterterrorism practitioners after more effective law enforcement options have been exhausted. I'll never know for sure without the full details, but there are a few reasons to believe that what was outlined in yesterday's New York Times was really a pilot program aimed at targeting al-Qaeda (and irreconcilable elements of the Taliban), and not a COIN training program to address Pakistan's worsening insurgency. For one, the size and composition of the force in Pakistan - Special Forces mixed with medics, communications specialists, and other technicians - suggests something other than a COIN training. Compare that to Afghanistan, where the Afghan National Army is fighting an insurgency - there are 10-20 U.S. soldiers to assist each of the ANA's 49 battalions along with NATO-ISAF Operation Mentor and Liasons Teams, consisting of 12-19 participants. Clearly two different models. Furthermore, by developing a Frontier Corps "commando" unit, US trainers appear to be building Pakistan's capacity for targeted CT operations, rather than the full-spectrum missions typically used against insurgencies.
The best indication that the training program in Pakistan has a CT, and not a COIN purpose, is a simple one - we appear to be getting better at CT. In the late 1990s the U.S. tried very hard to kill\capture Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan, but a perfect storm of absent ground intelligence, untrustworthy proxies, bureaucratic inertia, insufficient technology, and broader political constraints foiled those efforts. Today's Pakistan is a different story. CT operations directed at al-Qaeda appear to have been successful enough for DNI Director Blair to significantly downgrade the threat posed by the organization. Combine that with separate reporting on the tactical efficacy of predator strikes, along with the increased desire of the Pakistanis to become partners in that policy, and finally speculation that the better HUMINT cooperation from Pakistan's military is at the source of this newfound success, and it's not tough to discern a substantial shift. This military program, which extended across roughly the same timeline, is likely related to the change.
Packer is right - the U.S. will have to sort out its insurgents from its terrorists and adjust policies accordingly. In Pakistan that's an especially daunting challenge. But it's wrong to say that a program is failing at counterinsurgency, when it seems more oriented toward something completely different.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Posted by: Fake Chloe Handbags | April 20, 2009 at 10:10 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Posted by: replica Bvlgari Jewelry | April 29, 2009 at 03:15 AM
If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In
You are currently signed in as (nobody). Sign Out
Posted by: Bvlgari replica Jewelry | April 29, 2009 at 03:16 AM
http://www.best-jewelry.us/
Posted by: http://www.best-jewelry.us/ | April 29, 2009 at 10:46 PM
I'd guess it's a way to induce you to buy a shoe and see if it turns up.
Posted by: timberlandboots | June 06, 2009 at 04:19 AM
I am very interested in it, could you please tell me some more imformation? Thank you!
Posted by: cheap jordan shoes | June 16, 2009 at 11:07 PM
I am very interested in it, could you please tell me some more imformation? Thank you!
Posted by: cheap jordan shoes | June 16, 2009 at 11:07 PM
Thank you.. its helpful
Posted by: nike sb | June 16, 2009 at 11:07 PM
I listen to a story that I tried to hold up to examination.
Posted by: クレジットカード 現金化 | September 03, 2009 at 02:53 AM
Hello
wow nice post about CT, COIN, and Working out the Difference it gave excellent and useful info!!!
Posted by: Generic Viagra | December 30, 2009 at 11:28 AM
What a great blog! It's a pity that i can't find your rrs address. If you can offer rrs subscription service, i can track your blog easier!
Posted by: christian louboutin | January 12, 2010 at 01:31 AM
You have a very good blog that the main thing a lot of interesting and useful!
Posted by: Bestellen Sie jetzt Cialis | January 25, 2010 at 02:10 AM
Your blog is very interesting and I like to read it!
Posted by: Comprar Viagra | January 25, 2010 at 02:12 AM
You have a very good blog that the main thing a lot of interesting and useful!
Posted by: Buy Cialis online | January 26, 2010 at 04:13 AM
Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!
Posted by: cheap coach handbags | January 27, 2010 at 02:33 AM
Great comments! You are so nice, man! You never know how much i like'em!
Posted by: cheap coach bags | January 27, 2010 at 08:05 PM