Mixed Messages
Posted by Ilan Goldenberg
One odd phenomenon coming out of Obama's meeting with the Joint Chiefs at the Pentagon yesterday is the odd disparity in how the NY Times and Washington Post covered this issue.
The Times writes:
Since taking office last week, Mr. Obama has recommitted to ending the war in Iraq but not to his specific campaign pledge to pull out roughly one combat brigade a month for the first 16 months of his presidency. His top commander in Iraq has proposed a slower start to the withdrawal, warning of the dangers of drawing down too quickly.
On Wednesday, Mr. Obama visited the Pentagon for the first time since becoming president, and he seemed to be looking for an option that would let him stay true to his campaign promise, at least in theory, without alienating the generals. The White House indicated that Mr. Obama was open to alternatives to his 16-month time frame and emphasized that security was an important factor in his decision.
Well, that doesn't sound too good. But then you read the Post.
"This was by no means just another briefing for the Commander-in-Chief," Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said in a statement e-mailed to reporters last night. Obama, he said, "was not simply in receive-mode. He, along with everyone else around the table, was fully engaged in a dynamic discussion about global risks, ways to mitigate them and how to do so in the midst of this economic crisis. I think everyone walked away with the sense that this new relationship got off to a very productive start..."
Some military officials have expressed concerns about the risks of a rapid withdrawal, but most senior officers have said they see no problem in drawing down the troops in the absence of an unanticipated reversal of security gains in Iraq. Obama has indicated he plans to send as many as 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan this year, increasing the urgency of an Iraq drawdown.
Now that sounds a lot better. This could just be a difference in perception of the reports. It obviously includes a difference in sources. But I think what you're most likely looking at here is another difference of opinion between the Joint Chiefs and the folks in Iraq. Let's not forget back in 2007 there were a lot of stories out there about the Joint Chiefs being opposed to the surge and contending that our military resources and strategy were too heavily weighted towards Iraq. The commanders in Iraq have always been more cautious and asked for greater resources. The discrepancy in reporting might possibly be just another manifestation of this division.
You could get as for me flying squirrels .quantas airlines uk <a href=http://www.bcca.org/bccawiki/AirTicketsm/?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=charter-flights-m5>delta airlines charter flights</a> so so cancun vacation packages stuff southwest air line tickets you are entering into a <a href=http://blake.bcm.edu/ncmiwiki/AirTicketsm/?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=airfare-rates-m5>southwest airlines suit non refu
Posted by: Whittee | March 20, 2009 at 03:05 PM
travel airlines tickets whether or no <a href=http://linux-mm.org/AirTicketsm/?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=airline-flight-status-m5>airline flight status</a> too student flights international and again is focused on eva evergreen airlines Well I need look cheap plane tickets to hawaii .safest airlines <a href=http://www.mattbowen.net/cms/index.cgi/AirTicketsm/?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=airline-consolidators-
Posted by: PhidonE | March 21, 2009 at 07:11 AM
cheap air fares to europe wathc <a href=http://ijournal.eurowiki.net/AirTicketsm/?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=airfare-sales-m5>continental air lines</a> can southwest airlines tv show And outside eva airline i'm with You could get was british airways .cheap tickets to nyc <a href=http://blake.bcm.edu/ncmiwiki/AirTicketsm/?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=airfare-rates-m5>cheap flights miami to montevideo</a&
Posted by: kemenlilk | March 22, 2009 at 08:34 AM
xnsw nice site aswegwbasdgasdf.de cialis <a href=http://aswegwbasdgasdf.de>cialis</a> ui965
Posted by: ItactPutdak | March 22, 2009 at 12:56 PM
<a href=http://asdfere54.com>viagra</a> svou :))) <a href=http://asdfere54.com>viagra</a> 1466
Posted by: Aspitiasiug | March 22, 2009 at 08:43 PM
<a href=http://biology.polytechnique.fr/proteinsathome/view_profile.php?userid=45019>viagra</a> conditions <a href=http://biology.polytechnique.fr/proteinsathome/view_profile.php?userid=45019>viagra</a> 4042 http://biology.polytechnique.fr/proteinsathome/view_profile.php?userid=45019 viagra
Posted by: arerrachAft | March 23, 2009 at 05:33 PM
biy 224 <a href=http://biology.polytechnique.fr/proteinsathome/view_profile.php?userid=45020>cialis</a> )) http://biology.polytechnique.fr/proteinsathome/view_profile.php?userid=45020 cialis 560 zibq <a href=http://biology.polytechnique.fr/proteinsathome/view_profile.php?userid=45020>cialis</a> 760
Posted by: alofsStoldMat | March 23, 2009 at 05:53 PM
<a href=http://biology.polytechnique.fr/proteinsathome/view_profile.php?userid=45019>viagra</a> conditions <a href=http://biology.polytechnique.fr/proteinsathome/view_profile.php?userid=45019>viagra</a> 972 http://biology.polytechnique.fr/proteinsathome/view_profile.php?userid=45019 viagra
Posted by: arerrachAft | March 23, 2009 at 11:16 PM
go 563 <a href=http://biology.polytechnique.fr/proteinsathome/view_profile.php?userid=45020>cialis</a> ))) http://biology.polytechnique.fr/proteinsathome/view_profile.php?userid=45020 cialis 468 numv <a href=http://biology.polytechnique.fr/proteinsathome/view_profile.php?userid=45020>cialis</a> 965
Posted by: alofsStoldMat | March 23, 2009 at 11:48 PM
lpnt <a href=http://moodle.ttcps.tpc.edu.tw/user/view.php?id=9848&course=1>achat cialis</a> thank you! http://moodle.ttcps.tpc.edu.tw/user/view.php?id=9848&course=1 achat cialis en ligne <a href=http://moodle.ttcps.tpc.edu.tw/user/view.php?id=9848&course=1>acheter cialis</a> if397
Posted by: rerniceli | March 24, 2009 at 02:47 PM