Petraeus and McKiernan say no surge in Afghanistan
Posted by Max Bergmann
This week General McKiernan, the top commander in Afghanistan, and General David Petraeus made an obvious point: “Afghanistan is not Iraq.”
Both insisted that the challenges in Afghanistan are very different than the ones in Iraq and therefore require a very different strategy and approach. McKiernan said “What I don’t think is needed – the word I don’t use in Afghanistan is the word surge” and General Petraeus explained that every situation is “unique.” This is in stark contrast to the approach advocated by Senator McCain, who has insisted on applying the same “surge” plan that was adopted in Iraq to Afghanistan.
At last Friday’s debate McCain said, “the same strategy that he [Obama] condemned in Iraq. It’s going to have to be employed in Afghanistan.” In July, McCain said “the surge in Iraq…shows us the way to succeed in Afghanistan.” It is not surprising that McCain would mistakenly conflate Iraq and Afghanistan, since he and his fellow conservatives have paid little attention to the war in Afghanistan. McCain didn’t offer his “surge” plan for Afghanistan until late this summer and at the Republican National Convention last month, no major speaker even mentioned the word Afghanistan. As the situation continues to deteriorate in Afghanistan, the United States needs to adopt the comprehensive plan that progressives have been advocating the past few years.
Umm, I think his name is actually McClellan. Sarah Palin says so, so it must be true.
Posted by: Ralph Jones | October 02, 2008 at 10:13 PM
She not only got his name wrong but she got what he said wrong, too. He and Petraeus said a surge wouldn't work in Afghanistan.
She also said we were below pre-surge troop levels in Iraq. That's wrong, we still have over 150,000 troops in Iraq which 20,000 more than before the surge. She mis-read her cue cards.
Posted by: Stram | October 02, 2008 at 11:25 PM
She must read the International Herald Tribune because yesterday the headline read "U.S. General Urges Troop Surge In Afghanistan"... She probably only had time to read the headlines with all her debate prep.
Posted by: Lisa Pedersen | October 03, 2008 at 12:07 AM
"She also said we were below pre-surge troop levels in Iraq. That's wrong, we still have over 150,000 troops in Iraq which 20,000 more than before the surge. She mis-read her cue cards"
Actually, you're wrong. But it's more complex than that.
In the autumn of 2006, before the so-called "Surge," Coalition troop levels were at their highest point in OIF until very recently. Counting foreign details, the figure peaked at around 180,000 personnel.
This was due to rotation policies and the need for more troops during the O5-06 election season.
It took time to rebuild these force levels, which were then concentrated as part of the so-called "Surge" in the Baghdad AO, then Diyala. By the time major "Surge" operations began in June of 2007, US levels had reached about 150,000 troops nationwide.
By May, during one of these typical rotational moments, we had reached 197,000 US troops (which does NOT include personnel in Kuwait or at sea), pretty much tying the highest number of Coalition troops (but now much more predominately US) in Iraq.
If you're interested, I'll tell you where those troops came from: About 9,000 more Army soldiers (and active duty, with fewer reservists and National Guardsmen) plus 16,000 extra USN personnel ON THE GROUND and not at sea.
USMC levels actually had dropped the equivalent of a RCT or two.
By June, we had rotated out 15,000 troops from the May peak. This is where professionals tend to get ornery because the debate then becomes one of semantics: Are we discussing "baseline" levels to take into account the effects of RIP/TOA, or are we discussing total numbers?
Typically, we try to remain intellectually honest by factoring in two notions: BCT numbers and their logistical support.
If we go by BCTs, then Palin was right. We are currently dipping BELOW the number of BCTs we had in, say, 2006 for the elections.
If we factor in the logistical support (especially the USN contribution), then we currently are just over the pre-Surge numbers, but that's really only because we had lost close to 25,000 troops between the Iraqi elections and the advent of Petraeus as CMNF-I.
To be completely accurate, one should discount the RIP/TOA fluctuations and just go with our baseline estimates of the BCT count and the baseline estimations.
Which are: Very shortly, we'll be at a baseline of about 140,000 troops. That is about 20,000 or so LESS American troops than we had during the 05-06 election period.
It's estimated that this baseline level will remain in OIF until 2011, per negotiations with the Da'wa-led government, and rotations to increasingly declining levels after that.
Posted by: Soldiernolongeriniraq | October 04, 2008 at 12:12 PM
to snliI: I'm having a bit of trouble making the numbers clear in my head - at first you include 'foreign details' in your figure of the peak of 180,000 Coalition troops present in the fall of 2006. Where we are now is not clear, beyond "We are currently dipping BELOW the number of BCTs we had in, say, 2006.." I'm not sure how the number of Brigade Combat Teams matches up here - are you going by active strength or TOE strength, and why not simply go by # of troops?
Then you say: "Very shortly, we'll be at a baseline of about 140,000 troops. That is about 20,000 or so LESS American troops than we had during the 05-06 election period." Even assuming that projected actions work out as planned, that's not what Mrs. Palin said.
It's useful to have context and background, but apples aren't oranges and it would help to clearly connect the dots for simple-minded folks like me.
Posted by: JohnR | October 06, 2008 at 11:47 AM
SEO, search engine optimization. Is to make your Web site or Blog search engines more popular in other search-related content, as far as possible to make your site appear in the results of the first of several. This will bring a wow power leveling lot of traffic, instead of complaining all day: Why am I the one does not see. At present, some of my traffic from search engine Baidu and is the most stable source of traffic. I almost did not do anything, so naturally things happened. If the SEO from the point of view, I probably spent the most stupid and most simple way, but really effective. If the search engine as a beauty, then what is the point of a simple way to let her eyes you see more of it? First, you havewow powerleveling enough fresh interesting. Second, you are unique and eye-catching. Third, you are indeed very interesting new connotation enough to say that the speed of your time in the first issued a message, followed by everyone from here to you, then you are a source of information. Found on the girl has great respect for the source of information, as your grasp, it would wow gold be tantamount to grasp the numerous reproduced the contents of your site. In that case, she must be approved by the Changlaikankan your station. The fastest you that she is from here you get the fastest, so her customers can also receive up-to-date search results. So, note to Mars will not do. The result is you confuse the site in a large site on Mars, found the girl simply can not tell to your face.
Posted by: wow power leveling | November 29, 2008 at 03:57 AM
Welcome to our game world, my friend asks me to buy some 12sky gold . I do not know how to use the twelvesky Gold ; my friend tells me how to use. I will thank for my friends bringing me in this world. I am not regret to buy 12Sky Silver Coins . We all love game, if you want to play it, please buy 12 sky gold and join us. Please do not hesitate to have game.
Posted by: twelve sky Gold | December 25, 2008 at 02:23 AM
When you have second life linden, you will become strong. With cheap linden, you can upgrade and admire by others. You can use linden dollars to start the journey of the world. So, do not hesitate, let us move to buy lindens
Posted by: linden dollars | January 07, 2009 at 01:34 AM
Welcome to our FFXI Gil center. We can provide all what you want if you want. Our FFXI gold are specialized, professional and reliable website for selling Final Fantasy XI gold and providing cheap Final Fantasy XI Gold.
Posted by: buy FFXI Gil | January 20, 2009 at 03:50 AM
I hope i can get twelve sky Gold in low price,
Yesterday i want to buy 12sky gold for my friend.
Posted by: dd | March 05, 2009 at 09:30 PM
I buy aion kina with my spare money. It makes me happy that I can still earn some cheap aion kina.
Posted by: buy aion kina | March 20, 2009 at 05:25 AM
buy aion kina with my spare money
Posted by: Miu Miu Handbags | April 19, 2009 at 10:27 PM
buy aion kina with my spare money
Posted by: fake Bvlgari Jewelry | April 28, 2009 at 09:41 PM
This is a very good site..
sonra bedava chat
burasıda var bedava sohbet
Posted by: sohbet odaları | February 26, 2010 at 09:29 AM
Chanel Handbags are woman’s dream come true.
Chanel, a fashion name that has become synonymous with femininity since 100 years, is on the must-have list of every fashion-conscious woman.? And we bring these must-have Chanel Handbags at never before discounts, just for you.
It is only when you come across an Chanel New Arrivals, do you realize the power of her words.? Chanel handbags are crafted not just to be trendy, but trend-setting.? Hardly has lived a celebrity who has not been seen carrying a Chanel handbag under her arm; such has the influence of Chanel handbags as a fashion statement.
Chanel handbags have been so popular in the elite classes of the society, that their pricing is usually prohibitive for everyone else.? Discount Chanel handbags are really difficult to come across, but today should be your lucky day.? We bring you a superb unbeatable range of Chanel Flap bags, all at fantastic discounts.? With us, you have an incredible chance to buy your favorite Chanel handbags at rock bottom prices!
Chanel Handbags have always been at the forefront of luxury and style.? The Chanel classic quilted leather handbags and its reinventions have ruled fashion since forever.? Chanel handbags have remained extremely popular as they continue to merge evolving modern trends with the class and simplicity of its original avatar.
An Chanel 2008 Collection and Chanel 2009 Collection single handedly enhances the look you are carrying.? The reason you would buy a Chanel handbag is own a bag that mingles with your charm and intensifies it with its inherent simplicity.? If you have owned an authentic Chanel handbag before, you know what we are talking about.? If you are one of the unlucky people who haven’t yet gotten a chance to own an Chanel Cambon, now is your chance to shop for an authentic Chanel handbag and discover its ability to transform your look completely.
Buy Chanel handbags with us, and get fabulous discounts which you will never get at your favorite store.? We offer cheap authentic Chanel handbags and they are all up for grabs!
Posted by: chanel handbags | April 15, 2010 at 11:49 PM