Give Me Liberty, Or Give Me Stability
Posted by David Shorr
There are numerous problems with the way that Gregory Scoblete sets up a dichotomy between the universality of liberal ideals and the particularity of the world's different societies and their governance. Before launching into my critique, though, I'll credit Scoblete for putting his finger on a central issue for post-Bush foreign policy: how agitated or patient should the US be regarding the domestic regime character of other countries?
But his article is a classic example of distorting a policy approach to fit his frame -- the struggle between moral clarity and accommodation. If you're not punitive toward dictators (McCain), then you're passive (Obama). This passage shows how Scoblete skews things and misses the pivotal point of the debate:
Many politicians, Obama included, have spoken of the universal appeal of American values. But McCain's argument is different. He's not merely stating that they are appealing, but that they universally applicable and that it is in our interest to apply them.
I can't speak for Obama, my organization (and certainly not for other DA bloggers), but I think many progressive foreign policy specialists believe in the applicability of democracy -- even the US interest in same -- but think it's crucial not to overreach or lose sight of other interests. Obama hasn't necessarily put "a higher price on stability and cooperation with great powers than on ideological conversion." He might be making a prudent calculation about the prospects of conversion. He might have other fish to fry.
Here's the point about cooperation. I don't think Barack Obama or anyone else in this debate seeks cooperation for its own sake. The point of cooperation is to deal with urgent world problems, like nuclear proliferation, as Scoblete cites in his own quote of Sen. Obama. Take Iran, for another example. I hope Iran becomes more open and democratic; I'm optimistic that it will do so within my lifetime. I believe it's in US interests and would make Iran a better international citizen in foreswearing nuclear weapons and support for terrorists. Meanwhile, I want them to foreswear nuclear weapons and support for terrorists, which means we will have to focus on change of those policies and not change of the Iranian regime. That, my friend, is the real world we live in.
Scoblete's article draws on references back to the strategic choices of the Cold War. But another thing about which we must be 'particularist' is the difference between the stakes and circumstances of then versus now. The nuclearized bipolar ideological competition gave a differential rationale and context for stability. We shouldn't be completely dismissive of stability as a consideration (viz Iraq). The stubborn central fact remains, though, there are limits to how much you can compel or propel democratization. As every serious practitioner in that area will remind you, they're in the business of democracy support, not democracy promotion. In its nature, this is an opportunistic affair.
Toward the end of the article, Scoblete indeed highlights the blind spots of universalism -- summing up the critique of overfocus on regime character quite well, actually. But he doesn't recognize that international cooperation doesn't need to eschew the universalist outlook, just apply it with much greater care.
Isn't this just a lot of hair-splitting?
What is the difference between a universalist who recognizes that democracy support doesn't mean democracy promotion, and a non-univeralist who favors promoting democracy where it has a chance and recognizes there are some places it just doesn't? As far as I can tell, the difference is that the former feels better about himself for being more benevolent, and the latter feels better for not tying himself in logical knots.
Posted by: Zathras | June 30, 2008 at 11:56 PM
Penetrating and clever, Zathras, as per usual. Note that my post was a reaction to Scoblete's article, where I see real problems. Also note, a more substantive reaction to you on the earlier post.
Posted by: David Shorr | July 01, 2008 at 10:10 AM
I spent much Perfect World Gold on the gift.
Buy Perfect World Gold for me as present.
Perfect World Silver
Perfect World money make me happy.
Posted by: cheap Perfect World Gold | December 25, 2008 at 01:21 AM
Yesterday, my boyfriend gave me a lot of runescape gold as the gift. But I will buy runescape or rs gold to return him because I do not like that someone gives me something free. Although the runescape money is attractive for me, I will insist on returning it to him.
Posted by: buy runescape | January 06, 2009 at 08:30 PM
I hope i can get Sho Online Mun in low price,
Yesterday i bought Sho Mun for my friend.
Posted by: dd | March 06, 2009 at 02:11 AM
And welcome to our website, here you can play games, and you will get Perfect World Silver to play game. I know Perfect World money, and it is very interesting.
Posted by: Perfect World Silver | March 20, 2009 at 12:53 AM
Cheap Jordan shoes and Gucci shoes are on sale
Posted by: michael jordan shoes | January 08, 2010 at 02:59 AM
This is very beauty article, I like it, thank you!
The worst way to miss someone is to be sitting right beside them knowing you can't have them.
Posted by: Ugg london | January 08, 2010 at 10:04 PM
Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!
Posted by: cheap coach handbags | January 28, 2010 at 12:01 AM
Very well written post.I would say Beneath Obama's stated preference for diplomacy when dealing with North Korea or Iran lies a clear subtext: barring acts of overt aggression, America can co-exist in a world with these loathsome, nuclear-armed regimes. His objection to the Iraq war carried a similar implication. Containing Iraq was preferable to conquering it....
Posted by: cheap r4i | February 01, 2010 at 04:47 AM
the Nerazzurri have conceded just one goal at the Mezza, and that was Salomon Kalou's in the first leg against Chelsea. A combination of a good replica breitling watches defence, competent goalkeeping although Julio Cesar appears to have slipped a little after being involved in a car accident just before the return leg at Chelsea and excellent cover from midfield has contributed to the best home defensive record in Serie A.
Posted by: ugg shoes | November 12, 2010 at 03:01 AM
Hi, where did you get this information can you please support this with some proof or you may say some good reference as I and others will really appreciate. This information is really good and I will say will always be helpful if we try it risk free. So if you can back it up. That will really help us all. And this might bring some good repute to you.
Posted by: Replica watch | November 13, 2010 at 02:44 AM