Bush vs. the Force Providers
Posted by Patrick Barry
For anyone who was paying attention last night, President Bush made a mildly controversial comment, which points to an important internal debate going on at the Pentagon. While discussing the recent security gains in Iraq, Bush suggested that General Petraeus would be the ultimate arbiter over the pace of troop drawdowns:
“General Petraeus has warned that too fast a drawdown could result in the "disintegration of the Iraqi security forces, al Qaeda-Iraq regaining lost ground, [and] a marked increase in violence." Members of Congress: Having come so far and achieved so much, we must not allow this to happen.”
In one sense, this is all fine. Petraeus, as the commander on the ground, is best equipped to assess Iraq’s security needs, and what role US forces will play in meeting them. What Petraeus is not equipped to do however, and what President Bush did not mention at all, is the needs of the US Military, whose mission extends across the world. As early as September, there were hints that force providers at the Pentagon differed from Petraeus on the issue of troop deployments. Comments from Gates, Mullen, and Casey, as well as the reported views of Admiral Fallon, all suggest that situation is not so simple as the President’s comments indicate, a point that was most recently demonstrated by the Pentagon’s commissioning of an alternative assessment about the condition of the US military. The concern informing this assessment is clear: Our soldiers are under great strain, and the strategic needs of the country are too many for all attention to be paid to Iraq.
The President’s unequivocal declaration that Petraeus is the ‘decider’ for military matters in Iraq, given the existence of such a strong debate within the military establishment, not only sharply contradicts Military command structure, but it also obscures the nature of the challenges facing US forces in the 21st century. Iraq has been a tremendous burden on our troops, and our occupation has substantially compromised our ability to deal with emerging threats. While it may be right in a tactical sense to finish what we started in Iraq, there is a broader strategic imperative that warrants the President’s attention as well. Secretary Gates will soon deliver an alternative assessment to the President; I hope he reads it.
I suppose it is probably churlish of me to point out that DA posted within the last week a debate about Iraq that scarcely mentioned this point. President Bush is unfortunately far from alone in his focus on Iraq to the exclusion of all America's other responsibilities in the world, and the tolerance of many professed Bush critics for continuing to allow the commitment in Iraq to dominate the military's planning and procurement for years to come is but one symptom of this.
Posted by: Zathras | January 29, 2008 at 01:45 PM
Starting another ground war will be impossible while the Iraq quagmire endures. I'm inclined to see that as the silver lining.
Posted by: David Tomlin | January 30, 2008 at 02:32 PM
If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please SignStarting another ground war will be impossible while the Iraq quagmire endures In
Posted by: Valention Replica Handbags | April 20, 2009 at 01:53 AM
you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please SignStarting another ground war will be impossible while the Iraq quagmire endures In
Posted by: Gucci Ring | April 29, 2009 at 01:22 AM
If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please SignStarting another ground war will be impossible while the Iraq quagmire endures In
Posted by: Gucci Ring | April 29, 2009 at 01:23 AM
President Bush is unfortunately far from alone in his focus on Iraq to the exclusion of all America's other responsibilities in the world, and the tolerance of many professed Bush critics for continuing to allow the commitment in Iraq to dominate the military's planning and procurement for years to come is but one symptom of this.
Posted by: sesli sohbet | May 17, 2010 at 05:06 AM
e biodegradablechanel bags when you "stoop and scoop."
Dispose of animal waste according to the campground rules or bury it off-road.
Observe fire coguccinditions and always keep a full jug of water nearby.
Remove flammable brush near fire pits and keep campfires small.
Don't burn plastics and metalshermes.
Use non-toxic, phosphate-free, biodegradable cleaning supplies and sanitary additives.
Reduce the need louis vuitton for air-conditioning by parking in natural shade, opening windows, using awnings or portable sun shelters.
Wash air-conditionidesignerng filters when dirty, instead of buying new ones each time.
Reduce the need to turn on heat designer handbagsby parking in a sheltered spot, out of the north and west winds.
Posted by: k247br | July 16, 2010 at 02:41 AM
Measure out a good length of wire line or Links of London Letters, if the balls are larger, leather or cotton cord. Should be enough to wrap around your neck than 5 inches. If you are using wire, slide a bead embedded in one end and a part of clasp. Pass the cable through the securing of accounts, adjust, and then flatten the Links of London Sale with crimping pliers. Trim the tail of wire. String accounts. If you want a symmetrical pattern, start with the Links of London Pendants and add segments on each side. Add the second part of the hook or, if you are using a snap hook Should silver jewelry be plated? Silver coating can be done with rhodium, white gold, yellow gold and platinum, even. Another thing you should know when to buy silver Links of London online may no longer be done by hand or machine. Of course, pieces of handmade silver are priced much higher than machine-made counterparts because more value is placed on the works of human hands.
Posted by: tiffany and co | October 03, 2010 at 05:23 AM
good like
Posted by: Pandora Bracelet | October 06, 2010 at 09:38 AM