Kagan and O'Hanlon play General with imaginary troops
Posted by Max Bergmann
Fred Kagan and Michael O'Hanlon are very serious people concerned about Pakistan. And they think we should start thinking seriously about possible military options to prevent a nuclear armed Pakistan from descending "into the abyss." I'm sure we can all agree on that. But they have one minor caveat. Don't take the forces out of an "improving situation in Iraq to cope with a deteriorating one in Pakistan."
So if we don't take our troops out of Iraq, clearly any military option would involve very small special forces units or air strikes. But Kagan and O'Hanlon put forth a very serious magical second option,
A second, broader option would involve supporting the core of the Pakistani armed forces as they sought to hold the country together...this would require a sizeable combat force - not only from the United States, but ideally from other Western powers and moderate Muslim nations.
Yes, of course. Send 100,000s of American troops into Pakistan, but don't take any of these troops out of Iraq. Kagan and O'Hanlon clearly have a hidden stash of U.S. soldiers. Even if you were sending "just" 40,000-50,000, our military could not sustain that operation without taking our troops out of Iraq. But I guess in the land of VSP, no hard choices ever have to be made, and Iraq has done nothing to hurt our ability to respond to national security crises. Sounds a lot like denial doesn't it?
This American fascination with the "military option" has so many downsides it's impossible to list them all, and flies in the face of "the idea that is America" that some (e.g. Slaughter) have promoted, as well as the stated US policy of advancing freedom around the world.
Pakistan's problems don't stem from a lack of authoritarian measures. That's not what the black-suited lawyers were in the streets about. Pakistan has suffered from a lack of democracy and freedom, one result being the dismissal of its Supreme Court. Proposing military solutions in this situation is not helpful. "Air strikes"-- a euphemism for murdering foreign women and children (men too) -- are criminal actions.
Pakistan is a complex situation involving the unmet needs of its people (exacerbated by US policy) and its position in South Asia with Afghanistan, China and India on its borders. The US doesn't have the expertise to deal with these complexities, so along come some think-tankers to discuss "military options". No wonder the world laughs at US arrogance while US popularity is sinking.
Other countries don't have "national security crises". Why? Because they don't exercise "military options". Wake up, America.
Posted by: Don Bacon | November 18, 2007 at 11:43 AM
Kagan and O'Hanlon appear to be morons when it comes to internal Pakistani politics what faction in the army would actually support an American excursion into Pakistan? I'm sure the Pakistanis would see Americans as invaders and we could face another Iraq only this time with a bigger population and nuclear weapons. The Americans could diffuse the situation by diplomatically engaging Iran and making it a bulwork against any aggressive or fundamentalist Pakistan. Of course this requires nuance and diplomacy which seems to be lacking in American foreign policy.
Posted by: Peace | November 18, 2007 at 12:27 PM
I am fairly sure that some Army general (Odierno?) testified before Congress this past week, that our military is pretty much broken and unable to respond to any further international crises should they arise.
And still, Very Serious People insist we must go to war with Iran, and now Pakistan.
Draft the Young Republicans and tax the rich to pay for these new wars, if we must have them.
Posted by: r€nato | November 18, 2007 at 03:10 PM
Hey, someone's raised Benjamin Disraeli from the dead. Here's some news for you Ben - your old style Imperialism doesn't work anymore. The wogs have too many guns.
Posted by: CSSS | November 18, 2007 at 04:07 PM
Holy fucking Christ! This article reads like a briefing given by the Mad-but-Brilliant Dr. X in an Ian Fleming novel. Remote redoubt?! Aren't these guys supposed to be pros?
The two most entertaining passages:
One possible plan would be a Special Forces operation with the limited goal of preventing Pakistan’s nuclear materials and warheads from getting into the wrong hands. Given the degree to which Pakistani nationalists cherish these assets, it is unlikely the United States would get permission to destroy them.
You think? And then there is:
Somehow, American forces would have to team with Pakistanis to secure critical sites and possibly to move the material to a safer place...
For the United States, the safest bet would be shipping the material to someplace like New Mexico; but even pro-American Pakistanis would be unlikely to cooperate.
No! I'm glad we have these awesome strategic thinkers working for us to share their experienced insight that there is probably little hope of waltzing into Pakistan and working with a few wily inside men to whisk their entire hidden nuclear weapons arsenal away to New Mexico! But damn, I thought they did something like that in a Tom Clancy novel once.
Now we come to the "realistic" plans:
More likely, we would have to settle for establishing a remote redoubt within Pakistan, with the nuclear technology guarded by elite Pakistani forces backed up (and watched over) by crack international troops. It is realistic to think that such a mission might be undertaken within days of a decision to act. The price for rapid action and secrecy, however, would probably be a very small international coalition.
I get it. Within days of a decision to act, we could launch an international mission in which a bunch of "crack troops" work with some elite Pakistani forces to guard Pakistan's nukes in our remote Fort Apache, indefinitely holding off the rest of the entire country.
I'm guessing this is just the Phase I stopgap of the clever O'Kaglon plan. Phase II is when they come to the US Congress and tell us that they have just discovered that, contrary to initial expectations, the 50,000 man crack team in Pakistan is having trouble holding off 160,000,000 people. Or maybe Phase II is the part where, each time the elite Pakistanis take a chapati and chai break, we gradually Fedex the nuclear weapons to New Mexico, nut by nut and blot by bolt.
Skeptical? Don't worry. O'Kaglon has a Plan B:
A second, broader option would involve supporting the core of the Pakistani armed forces as they sought to hold the country together in the face of an ineffective government, seceding border regions and Al Qaeda and Taliban assassination attempts against the leadership. This would require a sizable combat force — not only from the United States, but ideally also other Western powers and moderate Muslim nations.
Which moderate nations are those? Egypt? Saudi Arabia? Jordan? The cool thing about getting Egyptians into Pakistan is that we wouldn't have to waste money on shipping charges to render captured Taliban to Egypt. We could just torture them on site!
But once this large international force of moderates is in place, we can get to work moderately to moderately establish a moderate military dictatorship over all of Pakistan, and then forcibly moderate the immoderate:
So, if we got a large number of troops into the country, what would they do? The most likely directive would be to help Pakistan’s military and security forces hold the country’s center — primarily the region around the capital, Islamabad, and the populous areas like Punjab Province to its south.
If a holding operation in the nation’s center was successful, we would probably then seek to establish order in the parts of Pakistan where extremists operate.
You mean, our force would be able to "establish order" in all those disordered regions that surround the newly-ordered center of the country - the same country O'Kaglon told us has half the population of the United States? How big is this force? Two million men? Three million men? Five million men?
Well sure! That will work! We all know that Muslims are nothing but a pack of sub-human primates. Maybe we can just drag a rotting antelope carcass around and lead all those disorderly Pakistanis off a cliff!
Enough already. Enough with these fantastical neocons like Kagan and their junior neocon cubbies like O'Hanlon. Why are these two still getting a forum in a respectable publication? As Grandpa Kervick used to say, "These guys ought to be horsewhipped!"
Posted by: Dan Kervick | November 18, 2007 at 04:25 PM
I think this is one of the silliest things Mike O'Hanlon and Fred Kagan have ever written and that is seriously saying something. Their read of internal Pakistani politics is just flat out absurd.
Posted by: Ilan Goldenberg | November 18, 2007 at 05:43 PM
"I fear I wrong the honourable man",
but these two clowns are not fit to write a comic-book or a Clancy novel.
"Just a tale, told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing"
Posted by: IM | November 18, 2007 at 07:22 PM
Dan, you obviously missed what Max said: "Fred Kagan and Michael O'Hanlon are very serious people concerned about Pakistan." and then you went and compared them to the Mad Hatter or something. Perhaps we should take these two, and Max, more seriously, ya think? Nah, they're all full of crapola. "I'm sure we can all agree on that."
Max: "So if we don't take our troops out of Iraq, clearly any military option would involve very small special forces units or air strikes."
Damn, I'm a graduate of the US Army Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth and these options of military action in an allied country never occurred to me, "clearly" or otherwise. Special Forces units are trained to organize indigenous elements within an enemy country to oppose the government. That's out. Air strikes? Against what or whom? And what would they accomplish, besides killing innocent people?
Enough about me. Bergmann received his master’s degree from the London School of Economics in Comparative Politics with a concentration on Ethnic Conflict Regulation and the European Union. Max is a native of Gainesville, Florida and received his B.A. from Bates College.
At this point in US history we have people discussing military options who are not qualified to do so. Now for comparative politics, I'll bow to Max. What about politics? Isn't that the bottom line, with military action being a failure of politics and diplomacy? You call in the military and the situation will be royally f****d, I'll tell you that.
Posted by: Don Bacon | November 18, 2007 at 11:14 PM
What a trash. Both commentators have no idea about either the complexities of nuclear weapons nor of geo-political realities of the region in which Pakistan is located. Don't take them serioiusly, such jokers like these two writers only make a fool of themselves by expounding theories which could appeal to only deranged war mongers somewhere in an asylum in DC. What Pakistan need is support of the people of the US in their struggle against highhandedness of military government led by Musharraf. If there is democracy in Pakistan and Americans support it and there is no derailment n future neither the nuclear weapons are in danger of falling in the hands of any crazy fringe nor the weapons will be brandished against anyone. Please think reasonably and dont lead the people of US to the belief that such adventures are possible. As if everything will be taken by the people laid back there.
Posted by: khan | November 21, 2007 at 08:04 PM
after reading Fred Kagan and Michael O'Hanlon i thought all americans are morons. that also explained the deep shit world is in because of uncle sam, but the comments on article do tell me that there are still wise heads in u.s.a, plz reclaim ur dear homeland from idiots like these(Kagan, O'Hanlon ). well then u r free to "secure" others arsenal.
Posted by: imioni | November 22, 2007 at 03:21 PM
Hi to every one: If you guys are unfimiliar with K" Street let join the Pakis Military and collect$$$$ were hey have all the retireD pakis Military and ex ISIs, i was waching and brsing an website an Afghan gentelmen saying to a pakistani (PAKIES give thier Mother for a dOLLAR$$$$$$$$...
Posted by: Murad | November 27, 2007 at 02:09 PM
he usually buy some silkroad online gold to start his game
Posted by: cheap silkroad gold | January 07, 2009 at 01:48 AM
I hope i can get mabinogi online gold in low price.
i buy mabinogi gold for you.
Posted by: cheap mabinogi | January 20, 2009 at 02:21 AM
Once I played 12sky, I did not know how to get strong, someone told me that you must have twelve sky Gold. He gave me some 12sky gold.
Posted by: twelve sky Gold | February 14, 2009 at 01:39 AM
You can use Entropiauniverse ped in the game. Entropia Universe Gold that you can buy too.
Posted by: Entropiauniverse ped | March 03, 2009 at 10:10 PM
The Pakistanis would see Americans as invaders and we could face another Iraq only this time with a bigger population and nuclear weapons. The Americans could diffuse the situation by diplomatically engaging Iran and making it a bulwork against any aggressive or fundamentalist Pakistan.
Posted by: online game | March 17, 2009 at 02:49 AM
Do you like playing the game where you need to use shaiya gold, when you do not have shaiya money,
Posted by: shaiya money | March 20, 2009 at 05:06 AM
The Pakistanis would see Americans as invaders and we could face another Iraq only this time with a bigger population and nuclear weapons. The Americans could diffuse the situation by diplomatically engaging Iran and making it a bulwork against any aggressive or fundamentalist Pakistan.
Posted by: Replica Gucci handbag | April 17, 2009 at 10:05 PM
The Pakistanis would see Americans as invaders and we could face another Iraq only this time with a bigger population and nuclear weapons. The Americans could diffuse the situation by diplomatically engaging Iran and making it a bulwork against any aggressive or fundamentalist Pakistan.
Posted by: Gucci Jewelry | April 27, 2009 at 10:27 PM
I am so with you,rolex watch
luxury watch
Posted by: luxury watches | May 23, 2009 at 01:44 PM
UGG Boots is your best ugg boots sale online Outlet where you can buy the cheapest
Ugg Boots.
Posted by: ugg boots sale | June 09, 2009 at 04:30 AM
Today, I earn a lot of allods gold, I put someallods online gold to my friends in the game. For my own use thebuy allods gold to buy some equipment, and there are a lot ofallods ol gold was deposited in the bank.
Posted by: allods gold | January 16, 2010 at 12:04 AM
Do you know that the Cabal Online Alz in the game had an important part, in the game if you had enough Cabal Alz then I think you will had an tall level, if you do not had enough cabal Gold
Posted by: Cabal Alz | January 21, 2010 at 10:24 PM
Do you know that the Cabal Online Alz in the game had an important part, in the game if you had enough Cabal Alz then I think you will had an tall level, if you do not had enough cabal Gold
Posted by: Cabal Alz | January 21, 2010 at 10:26 PM
to buy gil
Posted by: buy gil | January 21, 2010 at 11:43 PM
Gamers ought to know Knight Noah if they really like to play this game. All gamers want to buy Knight online Noah to promote their character level easily, more Knight Gold they own, more items they can buy in game. While we provide you Knight online Gold, surely you can get them at cheap prices.
Posted by: Knight Noah | February 27, 2010 at 12:34 AM
Have you known worldedition gold? It just a little component in the game named worldedition. The aliens are different, this time the story of worldedition. First, in the game, our role is optional, not dragonnest gold. The game can not hurt so friendly fires on their own people bar and then shooting type of weapon, there Headshot of this concept. In this condition, dragonnest online gold is needed. Players can buy worldedition gold to fight with the little monster. cheap dragonnest gold is so popular. You can use it to make dragonnest money.
Posted by: dragonnest online gold | March 12, 2010 at 02:31 AM
stoneage2 Gold in the game you may or may not notice. I know vitality is very tempting in stoneage 2 Gold.
Posted by: stoneage2 Gold | March 19, 2010 at 01:02 AM
Last year, I know the game mixmaster by chance; I try to play it to pass the time. To my surprise, I get some dofus kamas, later, my friend told me that how to get more kamas is very important.
Posted by: cheap kamas | March 19, 2010 at 10:19 PM
Do you knowAtlantica Gold?if you play the online game,you will knowcheap Atlantica Goldis the game gold. In the game,if you had moreAtlantica money,
Posted by: sfd | March 28, 2010 at 09:30 PM
In the Fallen Earth, getting the Fallen Earth Chips is important and different. Some players have not the gold, they would buy Fallen Earth gold, they can do some task to develop levels, what’s more, getting Fallen Earth money is best, because they do not spend much money. Last but not least, Fallen Earth online Chips is necessary.
Posted by: siwon | April 28, 2010 at 01:21 AM
Everything is very open and very clear explanation of issues. was truly information. Your website is very useful. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: wholesale cheap lingerie | May 13, 2010 at 09:31 AM
There is no black and white colors, such as gray and red like a timeless classic, and eventually replica handbagsbecome worse, Homme Dior, black A06 wake up call, the foreigners rouge, further improve the design of the initial sales to noble pure deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) Homme Dior, Dior men will bring clean ao in front of us the overall structure, surrounded by a black dial, simplereplica handbags and stylish design style spirit of Dior Homme.
Posted by: replica handbags | May 14, 2010 at 01:18 AM
Do you know Flyff Penya?if you play online game,you will know penyais the game gold.in the game,if you had more flyff money,you can had a tall level.
Posted by: flyff money | May 14, 2010 at 09:18 PM
why this and gucci!
Posted by: jordan shoes | May 27, 2010 at 03:30 AM
Iraq has done nothing to hurt our ability to respond to national security crises.dell pa-10I wanted to leave a little comment to support you and wish you a good continuation.02k6543 Wishing you the best of luck for all your blogging efforts.
Posted by: Laptop AC Adapter | June 13, 2010 at 03:18 AM
This is a really excellent read for me.Broader option would involve supporting the core of the Pakistani armed forces as they sought to hold the country together.
Posted by: Car DVD Players | June 13, 2010 at 03:27 AM
Produced pioneering spirit is very difficult.
Posted by: gucci sneakers | June 24, 2010 at 09:42 PM
In order to prevent the evil Lord Piccolo from succeeding in his desire to use the Dragon Balls to take over the world. DBO Gold can save your time. And Goku's quest is to obtain the mystical Dragonballs before Piccolo does. And the birth of Piccolo Junior Appearances also made by Yamaha and Burma. Dragon Ball Gold is very important in the game. But its hackneyed dialogue and sluggish pace may disappoint longtime fans of the book and television adaptations, DBO Gold can save your time. And Goku's quest is to obtain the mystical Dragonballs before Piccolo does. And the birth of Piccolo Junior Appearances also made by Yamaha and Burma. Dragon Ball Gold is very important in the game. But its hackneyed dialogue and sluggish pace may disappoint longtime fans of the book and television adaptations, dragon ball Online gold help you get tall upgrade. At Master Roshi and gather all seven Dragon Balls. Of which he has one, but its hackneyed dialogue and sluggish pace may disappoint longtime fans of the book and television adaptations, Dragon Ball Power Leveling help you get tall upgrade.
Posted by: Dragon Ball Power Leveling | July 01, 2010 at 10:22 PM
I truly appreciate you taking the time to post this. I really liked reading it and am looking forward to more posts from you! Keep 'em coming.
Posted by: cabal alz | July 05, 2010 at 01:36 AM
it looks nice and I want to give my opinion
timberland boots uk is the classic American success story of pulling yourself up by your bootstraps - literally. In 1918, Nathan Swartz began a boot-making career as an apprentice stitcher at The Abington Shoe Company in Massachusetts. He started on the lowest rung on the ladder, learned his trade, and through hard work and determination eventually became the owner of the company.timberland sale Swartz and his sons continued to make shoes and boots for many manufacturers, and in the 1960s they produced the first truly waterproof boots. The innovation came by fusing soles to leather uppers without stitching.Comfortable enough to wear all day and rugged enough for all year round.waterproof bootstimberland boots sale are equipped to help people make a difference in their world, whatever your definition of that may be. Whether a true hiker or just hiking to work, from boots to chukkas to boat shoes to dress casual oxfords, ShoeMall has men's Timberland shoes of all styles. Our women's timberland boots sale range from rugged boots to delicate ballet flats, for however you want to walk through your day. We also have a brand new selection of kids' Timberland shoes. They're the perfect way to start your little adventurer's day off right! And, as always, we offer free shipping on all cheap timberland boots
Posted by: Timberland boots uk | July 10, 2010 at 02:37 AM
Yes, of course. Send 100,000s of American troops into Pakistan, but don't take any of these troops out of Iraq. Kagan and O'Hanlon clearly have a hidden stash of U.S. soldiers. Even if you were sending "just" 40,000-50,000, our military could not sustain that operation without taking our troops out of Iraq. But I guess in the land of VSP, no hard choices ever have to be made, and Iraq has done nothing to hurt our ability to respond to national security crises. Sounds a lot like denial doesn't it? Internet Hosting save fuel reverse phone detective jump higher Electronic Cigarette
Posted by: save fuel | September 02, 2010 at 02:00 PM
I just added this blog site to my bookmarks. I look forward to more insightful posts.
Posted by: chanel handbags online | September 06, 2010 at 03:33 AM
We are a professional supplier of cheap LV handbags ,We can assure you the best price in China on
the basic of equal condition, because we have own OEM factory, the trade cost will be low. So you can get more whoelsale caps. Credit first, professional service and mutual benefit are our principles. Our
aim is geting on well with all of our clients and get a mutual benefit.
We sincerely hope to establish business relationship with you. chanel handbags onlineIf you are
interested in our products, please feel free to contact us for further information.
Posted by: replica Gucci handbags | September 21, 2010 at 08:43 AM
I can't believe how much of this I just wasn't aware of. Thank you for bringing more information to this topic for me. I'm truly grateful and really impressed.
Posted by: designer wholesale handbags | September 21, 2010 at 10:18 PM
Very nice article submitted,its worth reading,I think the broader option would involve supporting the core of the Pakistani armed forces
Posted by: Orange County Appraiser | September 23, 2010 at 06:49 AM
Special Forces units are trained to organize indigenous elements within an enemy country to oppose the government.
Posted by: Danny DeMichele | September 27, 2010 at 02:30 PM
If there is democracy in Pakistan and Americans support it and there is no derailment n future neither the nuclear weapons are in danger of falling in the hands of any crazy fringe nor the weapons will be brandished against anyone.
Posted by: Danny DeMichele Video | September 28, 2010 at 02:20 AM
Everything is very open and very clear explanation of issues.Very nice article submitted.Thank you for Sharing..
Posted by: Nursery Furniture | September 29, 2010 at 05:07 AM
Iraq has done nothing to hurt our ability to respond to national security crises.Everything is very open and very clear explanation of issues.Very nice article submitted.Thank you for Sharing..
Posted by: Baby Nursery Accessories | September 29, 2010 at 07:20 AM
Pakistan is a lost cause... we need to start thinking how to help our people who are unemployed so we can help our own economy
Posted by: Woodworking Plans | October 01, 2010 at 11:23 AM
The Americans could diffuse the situation by diplomatically engaging Iran and making it a bulwork against any aggressive or fundamentalist Pakistan. Of course this requires nuance and diplomacy which seems to be lacking in American foreign policy.
Posted by: Bathroom Furniture | October 07, 2010 at 02:34 AM
If there is democracy in Pakistan and Americans support it and there is no derailment n future neither the nuclear weapons are in danger of falling in the hands of any crazy fringe nor the weapons will be brandished against anyone.
Posted by: California Tax Lawyers | October 08, 2010 at 05:46 AM
I guess in the land of VSP,no hard choices ever have to be made, and Iraq has done nothing to hurt our ability to respond to national security crises.
Posted by: Local Internet Marketing | October 14, 2010 at 02:45 AM
If there is democracy in Pakistan and Americans support it and there is no derailment n future neither the nuclear weapons are in danger of falling in the hands of any crazy fringe nor the weapons will be brandished against anyone.
Posted by: Danny DeMichele | October 20, 2010 at 02:39 AM
Both commentators have no idea about either the complexities of nuclear weapons nor of geo-political realities of the region in which Pakistan is located.
Posted by: Mykalai Kontilai | October 24, 2010 at 02:45 AM
Kagan will feel right at home. Saban is as guilty as those ten Russian spies for serving as agents of a foreign government. But nobody seems to mind, especially the FBI.
Posted by: David Cabot | October 27, 2010 at 08:04 AM
The US doesn't have the expertise to deal with these complexities, so along come some think-tankers to discuss "military options". No wonder the world laughs at US arrogance while US popularity is sinking.
Posted by: InternetSlander.com | October 29, 2010 at 01:39 AM
The Americans could diffuse the situation by diplomatically engaging Iran and making it a bulwork against any aggressive or fundamentalist Pakistan.
Posted by: Copywriting | October 30, 2010 at 01:46 AM
If there is democracy in Pakistan and Americans support it and there is no derailment n future neither the nuclear weapons are in danger of falling in the hands of any crazy fringe nor the weapons will be brandished against anyone.
Posted by: GK Scott | November 01, 2010 at 06:52 AM
Kagen loves war to such an extent he must be masking deep insecurities. Playing high school sports would have helped him conquer his inadequacies or, at least, an occasional game of touch football.thanks for shared this with us.
Posted by: Sal Cassaro | November 03, 2010 at 05:16 AM
The US doesn't have the expertise to deal with these complexities, so along come some think-tankers to discuss "military options". No wonder the world laughs at US arrogance while US popularity is sinking.
Posted by: Eco Village | November 09, 2010 at 12:48 AM
The US doesn't have the expertise to deal with these complexities, so along come some think-tankers to discuss "military options". No wonder the world laughs at US arrogance while US popularity is sinking.
Posted by: freightbrokering.info | November 10, 2010 at 01:34 AM
This would require a sizeable combat force - not only from the United States, but ideally from other Western powers and moderate Muslim nations.
Posted by: Professor Prosperity | November 11, 2010 at 06:22 AM
These fantastical neocons like Kagan and their junior neocon cubbies like O'Hanlon. Why are these two still getting a forum in a respectable publication? As Grandpa Kervick used to say, "These guys ought to be horsewhipped!"
Posted by: local position | November 13, 2010 at 02:01 AM
The cool thing about getting Egyptians into Pakistan is that we wouldn't have to waste money on shipping charges to render captured Taliban to Egypt.
Posted by: local position | November 13, 2010 at 02:02 AM
If there is democracy in Pakistan and Americans support it and there is no derailment n future neither the nuclear weapons are in danger of falling in the hands of any crazy fringe nor the weapons will be brandished against anyone.
Posted by: reputation managers | November 13, 2010 at 07:36 AM
We all know that Muslims are nothing but a pack of sub-human primates. Maybe we can just drag a rotting antelope carcass around and lead all those disorderly Pakistanis off a cliff!
Posted by: Trade Key | November 15, 2010 at 02:30 AM
Of course this requires nuance and diplomacy which seems to be lacking in American foreign policy.The Americans could diffuse the situation by diplomatically engaging Iran and making it a bul work against any aggressive or fundamentalist Pakistan.
Posted by: Trade Key | November 15, 2010 at 02:32 AM
Great site. This could probably have the refactoring tag added t it.
Posted by: Tiffany bracelet | November 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM
Kagan and O'Hanlon clearly have a hidden stash of U.S. soldiers. Even if you were sending "just" 40,000-50,000, our military could not sustain that operation without taking our troops out of Iraq.
Posted by: Cross Country Home Services | November 17, 2010 at 09:40 AM
Maybe Kagan and O'Hanlon are making secret droids armies... or else, how in the world do we get this many solders?
Posted by: Real Estate License Classes | November 18, 2010 at 12:30 AM
The Americans could diffuse the situation by diplomatically engaging Iran and making it a bulwork against any aggressive or fundamentalist Pakistan.
Posted by: HMS Home Warranty | November 18, 2010 at 04:53 AM
The US doesn't have the expertise to deal with these complexities,so along come some think-tankers to discuss "military options".No wonder the world laughs at US arrogance while US popularity is sinking.
Posted by: Home Sure Services | November 18, 2010 at 04:58 AM
I think Pakistan is a complex situation involving the unmet needs of its people (exacerbated by US policy) and its position in South Asia with Afghanistan, China and India on its borders.
Posted by: Internet Slander Lawsuits | November 22, 2010 at 09:48 AM
I think that Iraq has done nothing to hurt our ability to respond to national security crises!!
Posted by: Gatehouse Academy Reviews | November 24, 2010 at 12:37 AM
It seems that, Fred Kagan and Michael O'Hanlon are very serious people concerned about Pakistan.
Posted by: Gatehouse Academy Reviews | November 24, 2010 at 12:39 AM
The Americans could diffuse the situation by diplomatically engaging Iran and making it a bulwork against any aggressive or fundamentalist Pakistan.
Posted by: Trent Jordan | November 24, 2010 at 02:22 AM
The cool thing about getting Egyptians into Pakistan is that they wouldn't have to waste money on shipping charges to render captured Taliban to Egypt.
Posted by: Pet Care Rx Reviews | November 24, 2010 at 06:11 AM
If they don't take their troops out of Iraq, clearly any military option would involve very small special forces units or air strikes..
Posted by: Gatehouse Academy Reviews | November 25, 2010 at 01:04 AM
I'm sure the Pakistanis would see Americans as invaders and we could face another Iraq only this time with a bigger population and nuclear weapons.
Posted by: Buy Toyota Parts | November 29, 2010 at 01:35 AM
I have never read such a wonderful article and I am coming back tomorrow to continue reading.
http://www.belowbulk.com
Posted by: cheap clothes online | November 29, 2010 at 01:55 AM
Well that's is true Of course this requires nuance and diplomacy which seems to be lacking in American foreign policy...thanks for shraing with us...
Posted by: walk in bathtubs | November 30, 2010 at 04:04 AM
I think reasonably and dont lead the people of US to the belief that such adventures are possible. As if everything will be taken by the people laid back there.
Posted by: San Diego Oceanfront rentals | December 01, 2010 at 05:00 AM
I think US doesn't have the expertise to deal with these complexities, so along come some think-tankers to discuss military options.
Posted by: Bathroom Wholesale | December 04, 2010 at 02:02 AM
There's more data from Michael O'Hanlon at Brookings. One number that gives me concern is the number of Iraqi troops and police at Level I (fully independent) and Level II (in the lead with Coalition support).
Posted by: get him back forever | December 04, 2010 at 10:56 AM
Where do we get the 100,000's of Amercian troops to go into Pakistan without moving them away from Iraq?
Posted by: San Jose Dentist | December 04, 2010 at 06:39 PM
Can we really afford to send these many Pakistan troops into Pakistan? They have Nukes and there will no way it will be such easy task!
Posted by: Auto Repair Marketing | December 04, 2010 at 07:14 PM
TO gave nuclear formula to Pakistan army will be dangerous for all human being, because their is no proper way to use to it all they have a different way and do can do misuse of it.
Posted by: indian wooden furniture | December 07, 2010 at 10:59 PM
I guess in the land of VSP, no hard choices ever have to be made, and Iraq has done nothing to hurt our ability to respond to national security crises.
Posted by: Internet Slander Lawsuits | December 09, 2010 at 07:53 AM
The Americans could diffuse the situation by diplomatically engaging Iran and making it a bulwork against any aggressive or fundamentalist Pakistan.
Posted by: New Foreclosure Online | December 13, 2010 at 01:22 AM
Well The most likely directive would be to help Pakistan’s military and security forces hold the country’s center...thanks for shared this with us.
Posted by: PetCareRx Scam | December 21, 2010 at 12:38 AM
Playing high school sports would have helped him conquer his inadequacies or, at least, an occasional game of touch football.thanks for shared this with us.
Posted by: Baby Nursery Accessories | December 23, 2010 at 09:16 AM
thanks for sharing Chat many people are pay more attention to one's wearing than before, especially a watch. Sohbet . Perhaps when you went to some place far away Chat you must borrow it from friends Sohbet you can get everything you want in this game
Chat money to invest in other industry which will return you good profit. Sohbet when you look at the surface of the watches Egitim from the city you live in and thought you knew nobody there Exsohbet . It sounds like you have a form of a disorder known as dermatillomania Chat excluded from activities and involvement in life; the dead are outside "the ring" of life. Sohbet
Posted by: Egitim | December 23, 2010 at 10:17 PM
Great site. This could probably have the refactoring tag added t it.
Posted by: cartier jewelry | December 24, 2010 at 08:27 AM
The most likely directive would be to help Pakistan’s military and security forces hold the country’s center..Thanks for sharing with us..
Posted by: 2010 Audi A6 Parts | January 04, 2011 at 03:38 AM
The Americans could diffuse the situation by diplomatically engaging Iran and making it a bulwork against any aggressive or fundamentalist Pakistan.
Posted by: Buy Me Private | January 06, 2011 at 04:47 AM
I'm sure the Pakistanis would see Americans as invaders and we could face another Iraq only this time with a bigger population and nuclear weapons.
Posted by: Naples Tour | January 06, 2011 at 05:01 AM
The Americans could diffuse the situation by diplomatically engaging Iran and making it a bulwork against any aggressive or fundamentalist Pakistan.
Posted by: Clocks All Around | January 07, 2011 at 04:09 AM
If there is democracy in Pakistan and Americans support it and there is no derailment n future neither the nuclear weapons are in danger of falling in the hands of any crazy fringe nor the weapons will be brandished against anyone.
Posted by: Condo Target | January 10, 2011 at 06:23 AM