Democracy Arsenal

« Stripping for Democracy | Main | Thank You, Henry Kissinger »

January 21, 2007

Redefining Success in Iraq
Posted by Suzanne Nossel

While the crux of Bush's argument for increasing US troops in Iraq is utterly unconvincing, he's made at least one point that is valid:  those who oppose his plan ought to offer something in its stead.  As he put it: "To oppose everything while proposing nothing is irresponsible." 

Progressives have for years now offered recommendations for how Iraq could have been better handled at every turn; much of the advice  was on-target and could have helped avert the current crisis.  But voters are concerned with what their leaders are prepared to do in the here and now to address policy problems, not what they woulda, shoulda, coulda done in the past.

Counter-proposals need to go beyond simply rejecting an escalation in the number of US troops in Iraq.  If we're convinced that 17,000 extra troops won't be enough to calm Baghdad, it goes without saying that sustaining current troop levels and strategies is a recipe for continued disaster.

But before alternatives can be proffered, we need first to understand what we're trying to achieve at this late date:  with even Bush having finally stopped speaking of "victory" what does success - or even avoidance of total failure - entail?  Putting aside why we entered Iraq and what we might have achieved there, what goals are still realistic and worth striving for now.  I offer a few for your consideration:

- Preventing Iraq from becoming an unfettered breeding ground for al Qaeda and like groups (to his credit, Bush did propose allocating a portion of the increased troops he's proposing toward this end in Anbar province)

- Preventing Iraq from becoming an enemy of the US - Given the state of our relations with Iraq and Syria, we can ill-afford an out-and-out hostile regime and population in Iraq.  This has implications for how we conceive an exit, and how we interpret our moral obligations to the Iraqi people.

- Minimizing American and Iraqi loss of life - Having the political staying power to work toward any other goals in the region will depend on mitigating the ongoing loss of life that has turned the US public so sour on the war.  Rising Iraqi casualties are also likely to impede other policy objectives, such as retaining amicable relations with Iraq and fending off al Qaeda.

- Containing the geographic radius of the conflict - Though you'd never know it from the headlines, most of Iraq remains peaceful.  Keeping it that way, and confining the conflict to Baghdad, should make it easier to reach a military and political resolution.

- Salvaging American credibility in the region - This is a tough one.  While the Administration maintains that any US pullback will spell victory for al Qaeda and its kin, having the US bogged down with heavy troop commitments and scant signs of progress plays right into the hands of Iran.  For others to realize that we're prepared to dig in to the point of self-destruction in Iraq may come off not as determination, but rather foolhardiness.  As I've said before, by remaining in Iraq (and still more so by escalating) we run the risk that when we do depart, our exit is hastened by events outside our control, such as a Beirut style barracks bombing and mass US casualties.   While the Administration argues that any leave-taking will only embolden the US's enemies, the problem will be far worse if we face a tail-between-our-legs, Saigon embassy rooftop style evacuation.  Facing up to a tough situation, articulating a redefined notion of success, and then pursuing it doggedly may be our best bet to restore damaged US bona fides in the Mideast.

- Preventing hostile regimes from using the Iraq conflict to their advantage - While everyone agrees on this, there are fundamental rifts about how to do it:  Bush is using a tough line, others like Flynt Leverett believe a much more conciliatory approach toward Tehran would do the trick and even enlist the Iranians in helping us in Iraq.  My own view is that these are unpredictable regimes, and that an opening for talks with neither preconditions nor high expectations probably makes the most sense.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e200d834db239853ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Redefining Success in Iraq:

Comments

Preventing Iraq from becoming an unfettered breeding ground for al Qaeda and like groups...


This is why no one takes your freedom agenda seriously. When democracy conflicts with American interests it is always democracy that is sacrificed.

61% of Iraqis support attacks on US troops. Over 70% want us to leave the country within a year. So just how do you propose to install a pro-American gov't? The Kurds are the only ones who still respect us, and many of them refuse to fight in Baghdad.

A pro-American Iraqi gov't is as much a fantasy as Bush's victory.


Salvaging American credibility in the region

See above, and adjust your policies accordingly.

oops, as you can see, the first Suzanne quote was supposed to be Preventing Iraq from becoming an enemy of the US.

Perhaps I shouldn't post before 6 a.m.

Susan, it's time to consider that some of the goals you present are in conflict with other goals.

On the one hand we have

Make iraq oppose al Qaeda.
Prevent iraq from becoming a US enemy.
Prevent hostile nations from benefitting.

On the other hand we have

Minimise US and iraqi casualties.
Avoid a larger war.
Salvage US credibility.

Two groups of goals. We can work for one or the other, but we can't have both.

To achieve the first set, we need a draft. With sufficient troops (preferably with lots of them getting arabic proficiency) we can achieve all of those. It worked in the philippines. It worked in panama. It worked for the USSR in poland, hungary, czechoslovakia, east germany, etc. It worked for china in tibet.

When the malcontents know they have no chance to win, they eventually give up. We may need to occupy iran. If we have the will, we can probably do that. If we don't have the will we can probably get the will if we're willing to suffer an event that will mobilise public opinion. Perhaps if unknown parties nuke Boston or San Francisco, say.

To minimise casualties, we could get out. We might find we have our hands full keeping the kuwaitis from overthrowing the Emir.

To avoid a larger war, likewise. Get out.

To salvage what we can of our credibility -- this one is mixed. To salvage our credibility as a superpower, we need a draft and overwhelming force. To salvage our credibility as a nation of sane people, we need to get out.

This isn't a time for half-measures. If we want to win, we can't depend on iraqi troops. I guess there's a possibility that might work but it isn't something to depend on. I mean, if iraq is a cheap gamble -- you put in minimum investment and if you win big then great, and if you lose then no big deal -- then we can just hope it works out. But if we actually intend to win we need a draft.

On the other hand, if we can accept a strategy that allows as much as 50% chance of losing, then we do better to pull out before we've lost. We aren't throwing the dice hoping to gain something, we're making sacrifices because we believe we can't afford to lose. If we can afford a 50% chance of losing, then we're better off not to make those sacrifices.

People who propose little half-measures like "surging" troop levels up to what they were before we reduced them preparing for the 2006 elections, are not serious about winning. They're ready to just piddle around and hope things work out.

I'll say it again. There are 3 choices.

1. Create massive forces that will win. We can try innovative brilliant strategies that might make those forces unnecessary, but if we need to win then we need those massive forces to back up the brilliant strategies.

2. Depend on brilliant strategies and hope they work, no backup in case they don't.

3, Pull back to a better defensive position and decide what to do from there.

The second choice is not serious. Anybody who truly believes we can't afford to lose in iraq, will support a draft.

I was sorry to see no mention on Ms. Nossel's list of reducing the costs of the commitment in Iraq.

Those we are incurring at this moment are not sustainable for the duration of the period that would be required to achieve most of the objectives on her list. Indeed, the costs already incurred will be difficult to bear in future years, since they have mostly been paid to date with borrowed money. The opportunity costs of the Iraq adventure -- not just in Afghanistan but with respect to American foreign policy generally and particularly policy toward the many areas of the world of greater importance to the United States than the Middle East -- are and have been very considerable as well, and Ms. Nossel does not address those either. For good measure she evidently does not think it worth mentioning that the longer the American military is committed in Iraq the less able it is likely to be to respond to future crises.

I don't denigrate Ms. Nossel's objectives, especially the first one. It just isn't enough, though, to identify things we would like to see happen. One must also have a sense of proportion. Iraq is one, mid-sized Arab country, saddled with a backward culture, a violence-prone religion and a baleful political legacy. American failure in Iraq consists in continuing to treat the country as the most important place in the world for the United States, and by that definition failure has already happened. The question now must be one of damage control. We can't answer that question unless we understand where the greatest damage has already been suffered and where it is likely to be suffered in the near future -- and it isn't in Iraq.

- Containing the geographic radius of the conflict - Though you'd never know it from the headlines, most of Iraq remains peaceful. Keeping it that way, and confining the conflict to Baghdad, should make it easier to reach a military and political resolution.

This is the one item on the wish list that is perhaps the most achievable, but regarding which the US has now taken a very wrong turn in response to some very bad advice and diplomatic threats.

Many of those more stable areas are in the Kurdish and Shiite run parts of Iraq. Since this war began, the majority of the Iraqi-on-Iraqi violence and the majority of the atrocities (such as today's mass slaughter at a Shiite mosque - only the most recent of a large number of similar attacks) have been perpetrated by the Sunni Arab backed insurgency. Similarly, the vast majority of global terrorist incidents against Western interests has been perpetrated by militant Sunni Islamists around the world. And those al-Qaeda and al-Qaeda-like militants now have a strong presence in Iraq.

Elements of the Sunni Arab community have been most opposed to, and disruptive of, the establishment of stable government in Iraq. And of course, most of the people who have been killing our soldiers are from the Sunni Arab community.

Yet, spurred on by old friends Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Turkey, Israel and Egypt, who have apparently mounted a recent diplomatic initiative and domestic US public relations campaign to convince us that a potential Shiite revival and expanding Iranian power are the most dangerous threats to US interests the region - despite the obvious counterevidence that 15 out of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi Arabians, and that almost all of the major terrorist attacks against US and Western interests in the US and Europe have been perpetrated by Sunni Salafist militants, not Shiites - the administration now appears to be in the process of provoking hostility and reprisals in those very Shiite and Kurdish Iraqi regions that should be the anchor of a regional settlement, and the key to containing the militant Sunni threat inside Anbar province and other central Iraqi regions. The Saudis have been particularly aggressive in making this case, in effect threatening to send zealous young Sunni militants into Anbar province if the US leaves Iraq.

Because Saudi Arabia and other elites in the region have their own self-interested concerns with Iran and the scattered Shiite communities of the Middle East, we have been treated in recent months to a ridiculous over-hyping of the Iranian threat. Iran, for all its many faults, is a country that is actually more democratic, and whose people are more free, than many of our old Arab friends in the region. And by all concrete indications, it's people are (somewhat amazingly) less anti-American and less disposed to engage in terrorist violence against us than the people of, say, Saudi Arabia.

And now, because Saudi dominance of the Gulf may be threatened by Iran, our soldiers are supposed to turn their attention away from the people who have actually been killing them, and turn them toward the enemies and rivals of those who have been killing them, and begin to attack and provoke some of the very people we encouraged to rise up in 1991, and then liberated from a brutal Sunni Arab-dominated regime?

Talk about your stab in the back. I wonder how our soldiers feel about being used as disposible pawns in this Bush/Saudi game.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

If you have PANERAI Watches , I still have my idea to achieve.

Jermaine seller Bottega Veneta Bag told us that he was not ashamed to rock dinosaur onesie him, but when turn to sing, he womens hangbags would smooth the way, jazz on the Marvin Gaye's "what." Wedge haircut before wholesale handbags did not work, vocal music, from the sacred The screechy kind of curtain. dfsssfdaaadftt

In a last-ditch manolo blahnik shoes attempt to craft a bipartisan health care reform bill, President Obama will release a Christian Louboutin shoes new proposal Wednesday that will include Republican ideas on tort reform and health manolo blahnik sale savings accounts, according to Democratic officials familiar with the plans. dfsssfdaaadftt

In a last-ditch manolo blahnik shoes attempt to craft a bipartisan health care reform bill, President Obama will release a Christian Louboutin shoes new proposal Wednesday that will include Republican ideas on tort reform and health manolo blahnik sale savings accounts, according to Democratic officials familiar with the plans. dfsssfdaaadftt

Thanks for your sharing,and you will enjoy the sunshine service. Let's abandon all the worry, omega watch and enjoy the happy shopping travel.All the are most in fashion boutique this year. show your chaming temperament. In addtin, the and the other make you mold your unique glamour this winter. The swiss have the high quality but low price. nd have all the style and cheapest price Chanel Watch Enjoying the fun of net purchase! We will supply you the perfect service and after sale support system. Our honest will bring you absolute satisfaction. Aslo and are so good for you.

Produced pioneering spirit is very difficult.

The article written by you very good, I like it very much. I will keep your new article. Thank you for your sharing! Cheap Replica Watches

Every NFL fan has a favorite player , Someone that they admire, look up to, and wish they could even be. That is exactly why Cheap Football Jerseys are perfect for the NFL football fan whether youth or adult. With current team colors of Midnight Green, Charcoal, Black, Silver and White, the professional football team known as the Philadelphia Eagles Jerseys have a popular jersey to share with fans.

To oppose everything while proposing nothing is irresponsible.

The opportunity costs of the Iraq adventure -- not just in Afghanistan but with respect to American foreign policy generally and particularly policy toward the many areas of the world of greater importance to the United States than the Middle East.

The Saudis have been particularly aggressive in making this case, in effect threatening to send zealous young Sunni militants into Anbar province if the US leaves Iraq.

Reading this blog i came around the phrase-"To oppose everything while proposing nothing is irresponsible." it is a very deep phrase to think..and I agree that before alternatives can be proffered, one need first to understand what they're trying to achieve at late date

This is the one item on the wish list that is perhaps the most achievable, but regarding which the US has now taken a very wrong turn in response to some very bad advice and diplomatic threats..Thanks

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

If you have time, please give me a few seconds by visiting my website at.thanx

Good post I agree and want the same- Preventing Iraq from becoming an enemy of the US...

Nice one..Glad to read it..The opportunity costs of the Iraq adventure -- not just in Afghanistan but with respect to American foreign policy generally and particularly policy toward the many areas of the world of greater importance to the United States than the Middle East..

I did not receive one of my orders and they sent me again by their own cost. The pills are as original or as other generic.

これは、ワンフェス等でサンプル展示のあった、水着アニメ「ウィッチブレイド」のキャラ「天羽雅音」と「天羽梨穂子」の親子を、女性 水着第16話で登場した水着姿で立体化したもので、とらのあなの商品説明によると「天羽雅音と梨穂子が親子揃って水着姿で登場。セクシーなコスチュームに身を包んだ女性達の戦いをレディース水着描いたアニメ『ウィッチブレイド』から、「天羽雅音」と「天羽梨穂子」がリゾビキニート合コンの回で見せた水着姿で、親子揃って登場です。母親らしい白いシンプルな水着に身を包んだ雅音と、腰の部分に付いたフリルが可愛らしい紺色の水着を着た梨穂子の、親子水入らずの穏やかでほのぼのと水着 通販した平和なひとときを再現したこのフィギ水着 激安ュア。手を伸ばして母親に抱きつこうとする梨穂子と、それをしっかり受け止めようとする雅音の姿を表した動きのあるポージングは、親子二人の確かな信頼と愛情を感じさせ、この二人の間の強い絆をうまく表現しています。なかなか珍しい親子揃って立体化されたこのフィギュア。ウィッチブレイドファンは決して見逃せない一品です!」と紹介されています。天羽雅音は、公式のキャラ紹介によると「娘の梨穂子と一緒に暮らすため、東京へやってくる。明るく天真爛漫な性格。ウィッチブレイワンピース水着
ドに「装着者」として選ばれる。6年前に起こった大震災以前の記憶を失っている 」というキャラで、天羽梨穂子は、公式のキャラ紹介によると「雅音の娘。元気で利発的な女の子。不器用な雅音を母親に持った反動か、幼くして家事全般をこなすことが出来るしっかりもの。料理が得意。」というキャラ。

If you know a chance to win them, and they finally gave up. We need to occupy Iran. If we willed, we can probably do it. It was very difficult to explain, is now studying. Want a peaceful world.リサイクルトナー

There's some amusing gossip/inside baseball/Kremlinology on this move, some of which I note below. But fundamentally, the idea that a holder of the intelligence position could even consider leaving it for a lower-ranking government job suggests to me that the effort to reform how we manage intelligence has, ummm, not yet succeeded. Something is very wrong if our senior intelligence job is less attractive than being the waterboy for ANY Secretary of State.

its spending power—the ability of Congress to impose uniform taxes across the nation and then distribute the resulting revenue

that this pact will definitely put an end to most counterfeiting practises within those countries involved in this pact. But this will only be fully benefit people if they are fully aware of what has been going on these days

But brick and mortar stores also have a little thing called overhead which means they usually can't compete with the internet.

years now offered recommendations for how Iraq could have been better handled at every turn; much of the advice was on-target and could have helped avert the current crisis. But voters are concerned with what their leaders are prepared to do in the here and now

彼らはリンク水着を取得するための最良の方法は、女性 水着人気サイト、人気のサイトを持っレディース水着てするための最良の方法を持っている人々はそのためそれとビキニリンクすることです判断するため、コンテンツの達人に来る場所もちろん、ここにある、コンテンツが必要よい。そして、彼らはそうだ。人々は最初の場所でそれを見つける方法を – ウェブサイトはあなたが考える必要があ水着 通販る荒野に追放される良質なコンテンツは良い品質のリンクを生じさせるのだろうか?バックは人気の指標である、それはGoogleが正確にWebサイトは、任意の特定の検索が実行されたときに配置する必要がありますここで判断するゲージとして水着 激安使用することができる唯一の​​ことだ。したがって、(検索エンジンの目の前に)ワンピース水着人気がある必要があります – あなたのサイトを指しているバックの多くは、あなたがリンク
して価値があると信じて他のサイトから来ているでしょう。

Your page is so fantastic! You sure do know how to keep your audience entertained. Im so glad that I took the time to look at this blog, because let me tell you. Not a lot of people know how to balance knowledge of a subject and content.

You sure do know how to keep your audience entertained. Im so glad that I took the time to look at this blog, because let me tell you. Not a lot of people know how to balance knowledge of a subject and content.

A very good read by the author looking forward to visit more really soon. Keep sharing more and more information… Thanks

thanks protected that there are values on what we are sex to fact our subscribers involved. Trait them vexed is one representation we staleness

I was totally wrong about this issue. I figure that one learns something new everyday. Mrs Right learned her lesson! Nice, informative website

Thanks the Administration argues that any leave-taking will only embolden the US's enemies, the problem will be far worse if we face a tail-between-our-legs, Saigon embassy rooftop style evacuation. Facing up to a tough situation, articulating a redefined notion of success

Well The Afghanistan but with respect to American foreign policy generally and particularly policy toward the many areas of the world of greater importance to the United States than the Middle East..

While the Administration maintains that any US pullback will spell victory for al Qaeda and its kin, having the US bogged down with heavy troop commitments and scant signs of progress plays right into the hands of Iran. For others to realize that we're prepared to dig in to the point of self-destruction in Iraq may come off not as determination, but rather foolhardiness.

Keep shifting those goalposts.

i cheered when he peed and then i put undies on him..he has been peeing in the potty all day! two number two accidents today..but i expeted that part would be scary. we will see how tonight goes! But good Luck everyone

always searching online for articles that can help me. Looking forward to another great blog. Good luck to the author! all the best

I cheered when he peed and then i put undies on him..he has been peeing in the potty all day! two number two accidents today..but i expeted that part would be scary. we will see how tonight goes! But good Luck everyone

Something is very wrong if our senior intelligence job is less attractive than being the waterboy for ANY Secretary of State.

have enjoyed looking around Mozilla Labs, we couldn't help but notice how closely the test tube image at the top of this blog post resembles a used condom. It had us all rather confused

Yes, go ahead and redefine it for the hundredth time.

Preventing hostile regimes from using the Iraq conflict to their advantage should've been a focus from the beginning.

Unlike some other neo-cons, I've always sensed a genuine empathy for Arabs on the part of Wolfowitz, an empathy which clearly drove

The concept of your blog is really very interesting and the pointers are exactly hitting the subject guideline. I definitely bookmark this blog and share it with my other friends.

A very good read by the author looking forward to visit more really soon. Keep sharing more and more information… Thanks

This Saudis have been particularly aggressive in making this case, in effect threatening to send zealous young Sunni militants into Anbar province if the US leaves Iraq.

Well if we can accept a strategy that allows as much as 50% chance of losing,then we do better to pull out before we've lost.Really nice one..

Thank you That's all I can say. You organize the article very well and your writing ability is really wonderful.As an English learner, this post is a little too difficult for me to understand. I hope one day I could write such good articles

Hi. I am Japanese shop.
Nice to meet you!

Thanks have been very considerable as well, and Ms. Nossel does not address those either. For good measure she evidently does not think it worth mentioning

My website is in the exact same niche as yours and my users would genuinely benefit from some of the information you provide here. Please let me know if this ok with you.

Should have never gone in there to begin with.

I think you are correct and I am with you and of your same opinion. might be correct once you declare this particular

It's not some parlor debate. But the same people who were wrong keep demanding we do things their way. That would be suicidal.

We supported the Haitian military and dictators for two hundred years, and then in 1990 Aristide came along and we got rid of him.

Shame on Google for no longer positioning this put up upper! Come on over and discuss with my website .

The software is certainly remarkable about my family's reality.

There's some amusing gossip/inside baseball/Kremlinology on this move, some of which I note below. But fundamentally, the idea that a holder of the intelligence position could even consider

Its about time we got out of there.

Well I am very knowledgeable after reading this. Not because I liked this article, but I got this in a very well manner. Very well explained.

A keen regard not only for the dignity of the oppressed but for those who will no doubt be made to suffer in the sullied name of redemption. Joe Klein, to his credit, keeps on talking about the chokehold political consultants

I agree we need to get out of there ASAP.

It's about time we draw down our troops from there.

I note below. But fundamentally, the idea that a holder of the intelligence position could even consider

The amount of data that I get is truly great. This is an good masterpiece. I m truly impressed. I would love to read more of your blogs. Please sustain posting.

A keen regard not only for the dignity of the oppressed but for those who will no doubt be made to suffer in the sullied name of redemption. Joe Klein, to his credit, keeps on talking about the chokehold political consultants

This is an good masterpiece. I m truly impressed. I would love to read more of your blogs. Please sustain posting.

Great site and a great topic as well i really get amazed to read this

Really appreciate this wonderful post that you have provided for us.Great site and a great topic as well i really get amazed to read this

I got some very unique information which are in actual fact very helpful for anyone. This is a post having some crucial information.

Great Site, your plugins are very useful and save me a tonne of time.kjhuyt

What Rosa said not to do, is precisely what you're doing. You weaselly little bad example -- you call me antisemitic just for saying there

This is a great work that you did,and it is really a great and superb pleasure to see some of the greatest and outstanding stuff that you share,so i will say thanks for sharing this great stuff.

Not too many people would actually think about this the way you just did. I am really impressed that there is so much information about this subject that have been uncovered

It is I rarely find in the Internet as entertainment and you have something interestinghere.

I totally agree with you that Counter-proposals need to go beyond simply rejecting an escalation in the number of US troops in Iraq.

Progressives have for years now offered recommendations for how Iraq could have been better handled at every turn; much of the advice was on-target and could have helped avert the current crisis.

You organize the article very well and your writing ability is really wonderful.As an English learner, this post is a little too difficult for me to understand

you did,and it is really a great and superb pleasure to see some of the greatest and outstanding stuff that you share

The opportunity costs of the Iraq adventure -- not just in Afghanistan but with respect to American foreign policy generally and particularly policy toward the many areas of the world of greater importance to the United States than the Middle East.

Washington managed to achieve a brief show of unity that barely masked underlying deep divisions.

the Shiva captain and other direct mourners because the Jewish tradition of Shiva needs to be followed intensely and meticulously. There are a number of restrictions and prohibitions

There are a number of restrictions and prohibitions

I believe you made quite a good job. Your article is well written, clear and gives precious information, just what we needed for this argument. Thanks

I really believe it's the US that is determinining how much crisis the world is in over Iran and will be in if Iran acquires a certain level of nuclear technology.

The entire narrative surrounding the surge has changed over the course of the last 12 months.

I would appreciate you that you pick up an important topic to write a thoroughly informative post on. I hope that you never stop and keep posting such valuable content on this site.

It is a really pleasure reading. The staff you use in this blog that is really very high quality... I love to read these type of blog... I am sharing it with my friends... Thank dud :)

Well the Administration argues that any leave-taking will only embolden the US's enemies, the problem will be far worse if we face a tail between our-legs, Saigon embassy rooftop style evacuation..

BeatFuse is the premier destination for rap, hip-hop, r&b and pop music producers (both established and up-and-comers) who wish to expand their skills, knowledge and/or sound libraries.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

Emeritus Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use