Hard Job for a Hard Nose Posted by Suzanne Nossel

Apologies for taking the long weekend.  I thought they had wireless everywhere by now, but they don't.  Here's a piece I just did for the Prospect's online version:

The Bush administration’s options for advancing the nomination of John Bolton as ambassador to the United Nations are now dwindling, and one that officials are now considering is the recess appointment. [[ADDED:  Particularly given the battle about to rage over Justice O'Connor's replacement, the prospect of another Senate vote on Bolton has dwindled from miniscule to nil]]. 

As for the recess nod, they should rule it out. Plenty of people have pointed out how hypocritical it would be for President Bush to sidestep the Senate after Republicans castigated Bill Clinton for doing the same. The main reason to avoid a recess appointment, however, is not that it would shortchange the Senate but that it would shortchange the United States -- at a time when we need a leader who can deal effectively with not just Turtle Bay but also Capitol Hill.

While ambassadors to the UN are called “permanent representatives,” they are anything but: Most serve between three and six years. The vast majority of UN ambassadors from around the world are among their nations’ top one or two diplomats, and their rivals for that slot are often stationed in Washington. The UN position can be a capstone to a great career, or -- as was true for Egypt and Russia’s current foreign ministers -- a stepping-stone to higher office.

The U.S. ambassador to the UN holds a seat even more prestigious than that of his counterparts in that the position is subject to legislative confirmation. Very few democracies have their parliaments weigh in on this kind of appointment (Belize and Bolivia are exceptions). At times the UN ambassador post has also had cabinet rank. These marks of additional status, including particularly the political stamp of approval, have become integral to the job of representing the United States at the United Nations.

Ever since the Senate rejected membership in the League of Nations in 1920, Congress has exercised strong oversight of the United States’ involvement in world bodies. It manages our role in the UN in numerous ways. Congress appropriates the money for the United States to pay its dues. Senators and other political players outside the State Department frequently weigh in with political considerations when the United States is deciding whether to exercise its Security Council veto.

At this point, a piece of legislation (Representative Henry Hyde’s UN Reform Act of 2005, a meticulously detailed mandate covering everything from political to managerial reforms) is wending its way through Congress. And it’s not the first of its kind: Congress has long passed laws affecting UN reform and U.S. dues to the world body. We are also unusual in that our Congress must ratify every treaty before the United States can become party to it. Congress frequently dispatches the Government Accountability Office (formerly known as the General Accounting Office) to inspect specific aspects of how U.S. contributions to the UN are being used.

Amid this swirl of political oversight (and second-guessing), the job of U.S. ambassador to the UN is, not surprisingly, also inherently political. While most ambassadors to overseas posts get confirmed and sent on their way, Bolton, as UN ambassador, would have to deal with Congress continuously throughout his tenure. He would deal with a series of issues uppermost in the minds of members, including the UN’s role in Iraq and Sudan and U.S. participation in the International Criminal Court.

But a good UN ambassador not only represents the United States at the United Nations but also represents the UN in Washington. The ambassador translates UN proposals and debates into terms that Capital Hill can understand. He or she hears out members of Congress and ensures that their concerns get heard at the UN. For the UN community, the U.S. ambassador is a conduit to its most important shareholder, conveying information, eliciting reactions, and shaping how issues are received.

When reform tops the UN agenda, as is the case this year, Washington’s interest becomes more focused than ever. The last time the UN undertook major reforms, in 2000, U.S. Ambassador Richard Holbrooke received visits from more than a dozen members of Congress and their staffs to New York. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee held its first-ever out-of-town hearing, in Manhattan, on the subject of the UN. Reciprocally, the ambassadors on the Security Council were invited to Washington to brief the committee.

Those meetings paved the way for a historic agreement that lightened the U.S. obligation to the world body in return for repayment of U.S. back dues. Reconciling the UN reform legislation now pending on the Hill and the reform proposals under consideration at the UN would require at least as much two-way diplomacy, if not more.

A recess appointment would position Bolton poorly for these critical political dimensions of the UN job. He would have a hard time working effectively with a Foreign Relations Committee and a Congress that don’t support him for the job. Bolton’s opponents in Congress would find ways of working around him, turning to UN personnel and other U.S. officials to get information and put their views across.

Knowing that his appointment would short term and lacking strong support, Bolton’s colleagues at the UN and in overseas missions wouldn’t rely on him in the way they normally would an ambassador. They would question his ability to deliver on promises and try to circumvent him by working directly with the U.S. State Department.

Another problem Bolton would face is that the politics would tend to revolve around him, rather than his agenda. Bolton’s every move would be viewed through the lens of how it might position him for another try at confirmation once his recess slot expired in 2007. His supporters would judge whether he’d maintained the stalwart defiance that made him famous, and his detractors would apply the opposite criteria. In such a no-win situation, both Bolton and the U.S. agenda would lose.

Bolton’s own supposed reluctance to accept a recess appointment may reflect a recognition that interim status would compromise effectiveness. The latest word is that the Senate Republican leadership is realizing this truth as well, and may now try to fold the Bolton nomination into some sort of broader reform pitch. Meanwhile, reform negotiations at the UN are proceeding apace. While its leadership has often been lacking, the U.S. delegation is taking a mostly reasonable line and making progress toward key reforms of the UN’s Commission on Human Rights, its peace-building capabilities, and its approach to terrorism. An ill-conceived recess appointment should not be allowed to jeopardize this.

Comments

[libertarian soldier]

Respectfully, I think you oversell the importance of the USUN PERMREP. While "The vast majority of UN ambassadors from around the world are among their nations’ top one or two diplomats, and their rivals for that slot are often stationed in Washington" may be true (after all many 3rd World countries have very few professional diplomats and often place priority on maintaining ties with the ex-colonial power), I think it equally true that for the vast majority of nations their PERMREPS are just that, representatives with no/little say in policy; rather they are spokesmen, plain and simple. Ask anyone in Main State how many cables (or telegrams, as many quaintly continue to say) they receive from USUN reporting that the PERMREPs are awaiting instructions from their capitals before they can discuss their governments' positions.
The USUN PERMREP is even more constrained, just as you point out, by Congressional oversight.
And I doubt very much this Administration, especially the steel-willed Dr. Rice, would allow much leeway to the PERMREP, regardless of who is there.

[rosignol]

Concur with Lib. Soldier- the US Ambassador to the UN will be little more than a spokesman for SecState, regardless of who it is. Additionally,

A recess appointment would position Bolton poorly for these critical political dimensions of the UN job. He would have a hard time working effectively with a Foreign Relations Committee and a Congress that don’t support him for the job. Bolton’s opponents in Congress would find ways of working around him, turning to UN personnel and other U.S. officials to get information and put their views across.

Bolton is the nominee of a Republican President at a time when the Republican party has majorities in both of the branches of Congress. What basis do you have for saying he would have difficulty dealing with "a Congress that don't support him for the job? Procedural obstruction by the minority party?

Additionally, your comments about "working around him" are a bit unspecific. Someone predisposed to interpet things uncharitably might take that as a suggestion that some domestic politicians might be inclined to undermine the Administration's foreign policy in hopes of gaining a domestic political advantage.

Remember, the USUN Ambassador speaks for SecState, SecState speaks for POTUS.... which is why I think that this fight isn't really about Bolton.

[awad babiker alameen]

my name is awad alameen am sudanese but am live in usa in adress 1322 briar wood rd k2 in atlanta ga am like to find hard job in un departement please try to help me to progrese my self am work any thing

[runescape money]

runescape money runescape gold runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape gold runescape money runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold runescape accounts buy runescape accounts runescape lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro goldrunescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money Tabula Rasa Credit
Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold

[Asda Story gold]

Do you like the Asda Story money?I think that if you know it you will like it. If you have it you can go to buy Asda Story Gold and then you can go to buy equipment to arm yourself. You can also get some cheap Asda Story gold from the game. Join us and play the game with us together.

[dofus kamas]

I hope i can get kamas in low price.
Ibuy dofus kamas for you.
dofus gold is present for you.
Do you like cheap kamas?

[Atlantica Gold]

If you have Atlantica online Gold, you can get more. If you gave Atlantica Gold to me, I still have my idea to achieve.

[angels gold]

Yesterday i buy angels gold for my friend.
i want him like it. i gave angels online gold to him as birthday present.

[jina]

my brother usually
buy runescape for me. I appriciate him. I prefer the
rs gold in the game.

[angels online gold]

Once I played angels, I did not know how to get strong, someone told me that you must have angels gold. He gave me some angels online gold.

[yargıc]

Thank you for your sharing.! seslichat seslisohbet

[cheap coach handbags]

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

[rokettube]

en güzel rokettube videoları,
en muhteşem sex izleme sitesi
en kral rokettube yeri
kaliteli pornoların bulunduğu tek mekan
yabancı sitelerden özenle seçilmiş muhteşem ötesi porn sitesi...